MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1955479008 · doi:10.1139/jpn.0729

Using psychostimulants for treating residual symptoms in major depression

2007· article· en· W1955479008 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Marcelo T. Berlim, Gustavo Turecki

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTreatment of Major Depression
Canadian institutionsDouglas Mental Health University Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVenlafaxineModafinilReboxetineReuptake inhibitorMirtazapinePsychologyDextroamphetamineMedicineMethylphenidateAntidepressantInternal medicinePsychiatryDopamineAmphetamineAttention deficit hyperactivity disorderAnxiety

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mrs. N. is a 44-year-old nurse with major depression who only had a partial response to venlafaxine 300 mg / day taken for 6 months. Upon referral, her symptoms were of mild-to-moderate intensity (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HAM-D17] = 14). When interviewed, Ms. N. complained mostly of anergia, fatigue, and hypersomnia (12–16 hr/d sleeping), but denied the presence of depressive mood. She was then started on modafinil 100 mg twice daily and showed a 30% improvement within 3 days. After 1 week of treatment, her HAM-D17 had decreased to 5 (i.e., remission of symptoms) and she was sleeping an average of 6–8 hours per night. As shown by the clinical vignette, psychostimulants are being increasingly used as augmentation agents for conventional antidepressant drugs, particularly given their usually rapid onset of action (normally within 48 hr) and relative lack of major side effects (Huffman and Stern, Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry 2004;6:44-6). The most commonly used stimulants are dextroamphetamine (10–40 mg/d) and methylphenidate (10–60 mg/d). Other more recent alternatives include atomoxetine (a selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor used in doses of 40–120 mg/d) and pramipexole (a dopamine D2/D3 receptor agonist used in doses of 0.25–1 mg 3 times daily). This class of dopaminergic or noradrenergic agonists and reuptake inhibitors has produced interesting results in small open trials with subjects with depression resistant to tricyclics, monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (Fava, J Clin Psychiatry 2001;62[Suppl 18]:4-11). However, to date, there are no controlled double-blind data on the effectiveness of these augmenting agents in treatment-resistant depression and, accordingly, they are not currently approved by the FDA for this indication. Modafinil, a novel psychostimulant, has shown promising results (in doses up to 200 mg twice daily) in the management of residual symptoms of depression. Indeed, a preliminary double-blind, placebo-controlled, 6-week study involving 118 depression subjects (using a wide range of antidepressant drugs) found that modafinil rapidly improved fatigue (p < 0.05) and daytime sleepiness (p < 0.01), although no significant differences were found between modafinil and placebo at end point (DeBattista et al, J Clin Psychiatry 2003;64:1057-64). A subsequent, placebo-controlled multicentre study in 311 patients with depression using selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) monotherapy showed that modafinil (v. placebo) significantly improved patients' overall clinical condition, compared with placebo (p = 0.02). Only nausea and jitteriness were significantly more common with modafinil than with placebo (Fava et al, J Clin Psychiatry 2005;66:85-93). A small, open-label study of modafinil in 29 subjects with depression receiving either paroxetine or fluoxetine has also suggested its potential usefulness in accelerating response and enhancing the chances of achieving remission (Ninan et al, J Clin Psychiatry 2004;65:414-20). Nevertheless, further studies are needed to confirm the effectiveness and safety of modafinil in major depression. Typical side effects of psychostimulants are usually of mild-to-moderate intensity (reversible with drug discontinuation) and may include insomnia, exacerbation of anxiety or agitation, tremor, changes in appetite and palpitations (Huffman and Stern, Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry 2004;6:44-6). Importantly, cardiovascular complications have not been prominent (even among patients with preexisting cardiac disease). Further, there is currently little evidence for habit formation or addiction (Fava and Rush, Psychother Psychosom 2006;75:139-53). Some relatively contraindicated conditions for the use of psychostimulants include recent myocardial infarction, ongoing congestive heart failure, history of ventricular arrhythmia and hyperdynamic states (e.g., hyperthyroidism). Finally, their administration should be avoided in patients who have been treated with monoamine oxidase inhibitors in the previous 2 weeks and during pregnancy (for lack of safety data in humans). In summary, although some trials have demonstrated benefits of psychostimulants as augmenting agents to standard antidepressant drugs, more rigorous controlled studies are needed before their routine use can be recommended. Moreover, the optimal duration for this augmentation remains to be determined. Marcelo T. Berlim, MD Gustavo Turecki, MD, PhD Depressive Disorders Program and McGill Group for Suicide Studies, Douglas Hospital Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Que.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2007
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Psychiatry and NeuroscienceSame topicTreatment of Major DepressionFrench-language works237,207