MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1963502878 · doi:10.1353/scp.2011.0010

Merchants of Culture: The Publishing Business in the Twenty-First Century (review)

2011· article· en· W1963502878 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Willis Goth Regier

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Scholarly Publishing · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiquePublishing and Scholarly Communication
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPublishingSubject (documents)PolitySociologyHistoryLawMedia studiesPolitical sciencePoliticsLibrary scienceComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Merchants of Culture: The Publishing Business in the Twenty-First Century Willis G. Regier John B. Thompson . Merchants of Culture: The Publishing Business in the Twenty-First Century Malden, MA: Polity Press, 2010. Pp. viii, 432. Cloth: ISBN 978-0-7456-4786-9, US$25.00. Following his 2005 survey of scholarly publishing, Books in the Digital Age, John B. Thompson turns his attention to trade book publishing in Great Britain and the United States. The readers most likely to benefit from Merchants of Culture will be authors who crave assurance of their importance and who want to understand agents. The final chapter, 'Trouble in the Trade,' exposes dangers even experienced authors overlook. Thompson also has good news for aspiring authors: 'Ironically, in a world preoccupied by numbers, the author with no track is in some ways in a strong position, considerably stronger than the author who has published one or two books with modest success and muted acclaim, simply because there is no hard data to constrain the imagination, no disappointing sales figures to dampen hopes and temper expectations' (200). Thompson is prudent in his method, generous with generalization, and sympathetic to his subject. Publishing professionals will encounter much that is familiar and can skip merrily ahead, but Thompson's attention to different segments of the trade offers something new for everyone. Thompson begins by defining the 'field,' following the example of Pierre Bourdieu. He counts five different kinds of 'capital' in trade publishing: 'economic' (cash and infrastructure); 'human' (management and staff); 'social' (networks); 'intellectual' (licences and copyrights); and 'symbolic' (prestige). After 400 pages it is evident why he ranked them in that order. Thompson says, 'It is vital to see that the field of trade publishing does not consist only of publishers: there are other players who inhabit this field and who exercise a great deal of power within it, and we will [End Page 387] never understand what happens within publishing firms unless we see that their actions are to some extent responses to forces and developments that lie outside their direct control' (100). He spreads a wide net, gathering in vendors and middlemen, audiobooks and movie tie-ins, authors and agents, print on demand, optical scanning, piracy, Oprah, BookScan, Google, YouTube, and blogs. Of course, he has limits. His account of the trade presence of university presses is confined to the New York-Boston ambit (181-6). Canada is overlooked. He bypasses libraries and their associations, barely mentions the Association of American Publishers, and ignores government agencies that tax and censor. Book reviewing is discussed in passing in scattered places (see 243-4) but is not taken up as a distinct topic. Even so, Thompson covers much. Before he gets to publishers, he introduces two other major players: retailers and literary agents. His research into retailers looks past bookstores (used, new, and online) to mass merchandise outlets like Wal-Mart, Target, and Costco, and the special case of Amazon. His chapter on literary agents surveys the profession from its beginnings in England in the late nineteenth century to the exceptional careers of Morton Janklow and Andrew Wylie. Only in chapter 3 does he focus attention on publishers. Late in the book he lays out what he calls the 'logic of the field,' justifying his chapter sequence (291-2). Thompson's chapter on publishing corporations summarizes the acquisition and divestment that led to the current consolidation of trade publishing, with 63.7 per cent of the US market controlled by twelve conglomerates, four of the largest five of which are foreign owned (116-7). Foreign conglomerates such as Bertelsmann were willing and able to buy large publishing firms in the United States because 'they don't have to deal with the Wall Street quarterly mentality and they can afford to take a longer term strategic view' (112). Thompson respects giants. He believes the great publishers had to grow enormous to defend themselves from the giant retailers and says that small publishers should not fear large ones; instead, publishers large and small must battle the chains and mighty Amazon. He writes that 'the rise of large publishing corporations has gone hand in hand with the proliferation...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,020
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,016
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche, Communication savante, Science ouverte, Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesCommunication savante
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,784
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0200,016
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0470,185
Science ouverte0,0060,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,088
Tête enseignante GPT0,253
Écart entre enseignants0,165 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2011
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Scholarly PublishingMême sujetPublishing and Scholarly CommunicationTravaux en français237 207