MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1963567199 · doi:10.1176/pn.39.18.0390024

Clozapine Study Zeroes In On Dopamine Receptors

2004· article· en· W1963567199 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jim Rosack

Notice bibliographique

RevuePsychiatric News · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueSchizophrenia research and treatment
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésClozapineDopamine receptor D2Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming)AntipsychoticDopaminePsychiatryAdverse effectPsychologyMedicinePharmacologyInternal medicineNeuroscience

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Clinical & Research NewsFull AccessClozapine Study Zeroes In On Dopamine ReceptorsJim RosackJim RosackPublished Online:17 Sep 2004https://doi.org/10.1176/pn.39.18.0390024Clozapine (Clozaril) stands alone in its effectiveness in the treatment of patients with refractory schizophrenia. As new antipsychotic medications have come (and some gone), researchers have continued their attempts to discover the molecular secrets of the drug, hoping to tease out and exploit those properties that contribute to its effectiveness, while discarding those properties responsible for significant adverse effects.In a new study using positron emission tomography (PET), researchers have determined that clozapine alone among the newer generation antipsychotics has a relatively balanced affinity for dopamine type 1 (D1) receptors and dopamine type 2 (D2) receptors. This balanced D1/D2 ratio, they noted, may be the answer to the question. The research, led by Johannes Tauscher, M.D., a professor of psychiatry at the Medical University of Vienna, Austria, along with a group of researchers at the University of Toronto, appears in the September issue of the American Journal of Psychiatry. The work was funded by Eli Lilly Canada.Many have put forth theories for clozapine's relative superiority in treating schizophrenia patients who have not responded to other medications. It has been noted, for example, that the medication's low propensity to induce extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) is explained by its combined antagonism of both 5HT-2A and D2 receptors, and possibly also its relatively quick dissociation from the D2 receptor after binding. But while these pharmacologic factors could explain its low EPS profile, researchers believe they do not contribute to an explanation of the drug's greater efficacy in certain patient populations.Other theories have been put forward, including clozapine's affinity to bind to the D4 receptor; however, to date, Tauscher and his colleagues stressed, "none of these theories has held so far." The team set out to determine whether the medication's affinity for the D1 receptor—previously documented in animal studies—could play a role.Tauscher's team studied 25 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who were receiving ongoing antipsychotic therapy either as inpatients or outpatients. Patients had been on stable doses of second-generation antipsychotics for at least 14 days prior to PET scanning. Seven patients were on clozapine, six on olanzapine (Zyprexa), five on quetiapine (Seroquel), and seven on risperidone (Risperdal). Using two radioligands—specific for either D1 receptors or D2 receptors—each patient was scanned using standard PET protocols to determine receptor binding, specifically to dopamine receptors in the striatum.The affinities for the four antipsychotic medications varied greatly. Clozapine was found to bind the strongest to D1 receptors (55 percent of D1 receptors bound), followed in decreasing order by olanzapine (43 percent), risperidone (25 percent), and quetiapine (12 percent). In contrast, risperidone bound most tightly to D2 (81 percent of receptors bound), followed by olanzapine (79 percent), clozapine (61 percent), and quetiapine (30 percent).Significantly, Tauscher and his colleagues noted, clozapine is the only one of the four medications to even come close to a ratio of 1. Clozapine's D1/D2 binding ratio specifically was 0.88, while olanzapine exhibited a binding ratio of 0.54, quetiapine a ratio of 0.41, and risperidone a ratio of 0.31.Tausher and his colleagues suggested that their pilot study provides" a strong impetus for prospective clinical studies focusing on the role of dopamine D1 receptors," while they cautioned that" it is still unclear whether agonistic or antagonistic properties are desirable."Determining the second half of the equation, they said, could lead to advances in efforts to develop new antipsychotic medications with enhanced therapeutic efficacy.The study, "Equivalent Occupancy of Dopamine D1and D2 Receptors With Clozapine: Differentiation From Other Atypical Antipsychotics," is posted online at .▪ Am J Psychiatry 2004 161 1620 ISSUES NewArchived

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,049
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,165

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0490,006

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,319
Écart entre enseignants0,297 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePsychiatric NewsMême sujetSchizophrenia research and treatmentTravaux en français237 207