MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1963567199 · doi:10.1176/pn.39.18.0390024

Clozapine Study Zeroes In On Dopamine Receptors

2004· article· en· W1963567199 on OpenAlex
Jim Rosack

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychiatric News · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClozapineDopamine receptor D2Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming)AntipsychoticDopaminePsychiatryAdverse effectPsychologyMedicinePharmacologyInternal medicineNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Clinical & Research NewsFull AccessClozapine Study Zeroes In On Dopamine ReceptorsJim RosackJim RosackPublished Online:17 Sep 2004https://doi.org/10.1176/pn.39.18.0390024Clozapine (Clozaril) stands alone in its effectiveness in the treatment of patients with refractory schizophrenia. As new antipsychotic medications have come (and some gone), researchers have continued their attempts to discover the molecular secrets of the drug, hoping to tease out and exploit those properties that contribute to its effectiveness, while discarding those properties responsible for significant adverse effects.In a new study using positron emission tomography (PET), researchers have determined that clozapine alone among the newer generation antipsychotics has a relatively balanced affinity for dopamine type 1 (D1) receptors and dopamine type 2 (D2) receptors. This balanced D1/D2 ratio, they noted, may be the answer to the question. The research, led by Johannes Tauscher, M.D., a professor of psychiatry at the Medical University of Vienna, Austria, along with a group of researchers at the University of Toronto, appears in the September issue of the American Journal of Psychiatry. The work was funded by Eli Lilly Canada.Many have put forth theories for clozapine's relative superiority in treating schizophrenia patients who have not responded to other medications. It has been noted, for example, that the medication's low propensity to induce extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) is explained by its combined antagonism of both 5HT-2A and D2 receptors, and possibly also its relatively quick dissociation from the D2 receptor after binding. But while these pharmacologic factors could explain its low EPS profile, researchers believe they do not contribute to an explanation of the drug's greater efficacy in certain patient populations.Other theories have been put forward, including clozapine's affinity to bind to the D4 receptor; however, to date, Tauscher and his colleagues stressed, "none of these theories has held so far." The team set out to determine whether the medication's affinity for the D1 receptor—previously documented in animal studies—could play a role.Tauscher's team studied 25 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who were receiving ongoing antipsychotic therapy either as inpatients or outpatients. Patients had been on stable doses of second-generation antipsychotics for at least 14 days prior to PET scanning. Seven patients were on clozapine, six on olanzapine (Zyprexa), five on quetiapine (Seroquel), and seven on risperidone (Risperdal). Using two radioligands—specific for either D1 receptors or D2 receptors—each patient was scanned using standard PET protocols to determine receptor binding, specifically to dopamine receptors in the striatum.The affinities for the four antipsychotic medications varied greatly. Clozapine was found to bind the strongest to D1 receptors (55 percent of D1 receptors bound), followed in decreasing order by olanzapine (43 percent), risperidone (25 percent), and quetiapine (12 percent). In contrast, risperidone bound most tightly to D2 (81 percent of receptors bound), followed by olanzapine (79 percent), clozapine (61 percent), and quetiapine (30 percent).Significantly, Tauscher and his colleagues noted, clozapine is the only one of the four medications to even come close to a ratio of 1. Clozapine's D1/D2 binding ratio specifically was 0.88, while olanzapine exhibited a binding ratio of 0.54, quetiapine a ratio of 0.41, and risperidone a ratio of 0.31.Tausher and his colleagues suggested that their pilot study provides" a strong impetus for prospective clinical studies focusing on the role of dopamine D1 receptors," while they cautioned that" it is still unclear whether agonistic or antagonistic properties are desirable."Determining the second half of the equation, they said, could lead to advances in efforts to develop new antipsychotic medications with enhanced therapeutic efficacy.The study, "Equivalent Occupancy of Dopamine D1and D2 Receptors With Clozapine: Differentiation From Other Atypical Antipsychotics," is posted online at<http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/161/9/1620>.▪ Am J Psychiatry 2004 161 1620 ISSUES NewArchived

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.178
Threshold uncertainty score0.662

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it