Developing Teachers' Capacity for Ecojustice Education and Community-Based Learning
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Vignette In summer of 2009, a group of teachers, community activists, and university professors came together in a Summer Institute on EcoJustice Education and Community-Based Learning held by Southeast Michigan Stewardship Coalitions at Eastern Michigan University (EMU). A series of workshops were organized to help participants examine interwoven foundations and educational implications of social and ecological violence. They read and discussed a passage from Val Plumwood's book Environmental Culture (2002) in which she interrogates what she calls the illusion of disembeddedness--our hyperseparation from nature and its connection to a more general logic of domination--and they watched a film called Race: The Power of an Illusion (2003). Following film, group engaged in a silent chalk talk, (1) filling board with their responses to question: What does study of race as an illusion have to do with our desire to teach for stewardship and ecojustice? Below is a sample of their comments: * The language that we use to rationalize racism relies on oppression of nature. Some races are wild, uncivilized, etc ... * Start by teaching how to appreciate differences instead of devaluing them. * OK--how do we teach instead to undo anthropocentric teaching/acting? * Anthropocentrism--other types of dualistic thinking. Helping students become stewards for environment will hopefully lead them to realize hierarchical nature of other dualist principles. * I really like this concept [arrow to anthropocentrism]. * Drives home importance of not thinking dualistically. * Stewardship is seen as part of healing process from ages of dominance and oppression. It is a way of creating a new wholeness and being less concerned with pieces. This silent conversation was followed by a powerful open conversation among participants reflecting on series of activities they had experienced. Together, they shared further insights, questions, and their emotional reactions to issues explored. As might be expected there were varying levels of analytic insight, but lots of energy in their reactions. One thing was sure, we were embarking on an important journey together. In this article, we lay out primary aspects of EcoJustice Education as a model of teacher education and school reform by examining complexities of teacher professional development as they encounter these ideas, focusing on work of Southeast Michigan Stewardship Coalition. Context The world is facing enormous ecological and social problems--top soil loss, overfishing and acidification of our oceans, loss of potable water and access to safe food sources, and global climate change are just tip of iceberg. Furthermore, there is an increasing gap in world-wide control of resources as modern industrial cultures (the United States, Canada, Europe and Japan) representing about 20% of world's population enjoy 83% of world's wealth gleaned from nature and human labor. Meanwhile three billion people, nearly half of people in world--many of whom once lived on land now controlled by corporations--are forced to work for less than two dollars a day, hardly enough to feed themselves. In our own country, young children from Black and Latino families are suffering from high rates of asthma, lead poisoning, obesity, and nutrition-related diseases as their families are forced to live in impoverished conditions disproportionately close to toxin-belching incinerators and in urban areas classified as food deserts. How many of us consider lack of access to potable water in our own cities and world-wide, or Texas-sized mass of plastic floating in North Pacific as we drink from our bottles of spring water, often sucked out of our own aquifers and yet more expensive than gasoline? …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle