Developing Teachers' Capacity for Ecojustice Education and Community-Based Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vignette In summer of 2009, a group of teachers, community activists, and university professors came together in a Summer Institute on EcoJustice Education and Community-Based Learning held by Southeast Michigan Stewardship Coalitions at Eastern Michigan University (EMU). A series of workshops were organized to help participants examine interwoven foundations and educational implications of social and ecological violence. They read and discussed a passage from Val Plumwood's book Environmental Culture (2002) in which she interrogates what she calls the illusion of disembeddedness--our hyperseparation from nature and its connection to a more general logic of domination--and they watched a film called Race: The Power of an Illusion (2003). Following film, group engaged in a silent chalk talk, (1) filling board with their responses to question: What does study of race as an illusion have to do with our desire to teach for stewardship and ecojustice? Below is a sample of their comments: * The language that we use to rationalize racism relies on oppression of nature. Some races are wild, uncivilized, etc ... * Start by teaching how to appreciate differences instead of devaluing them. * OK--how do we teach instead to undo anthropocentric teaching/acting? * Anthropocentrism--other types of dualistic thinking. Helping students become stewards for environment will hopefully lead them to realize hierarchical nature of other dualist principles. * I really like this concept [arrow to anthropocentrism]. * Drives home importance of not thinking dualistically. * Stewardship is seen as part of healing process from ages of dominance and oppression. It is a way of creating a new wholeness and being less concerned with pieces. This silent conversation was followed by a powerful open conversation among participants reflecting on series of activities they had experienced. Together, they shared further insights, questions, and their emotional reactions to issues explored. As might be expected there were varying levels of analytic insight, but lots of energy in their reactions. One thing was sure, we were embarking on an important journey together. In this article, we lay out primary aspects of EcoJustice Education as a model of teacher education and school reform by examining complexities of teacher professional development as they encounter these ideas, focusing on work of Southeast Michigan Stewardship Coalition. Context The world is facing enormous ecological and social problems--top soil loss, overfishing and acidification of our oceans, loss of potable water and access to safe food sources, and global climate change are just tip of iceberg. Furthermore, there is an increasing gap in world-wide control of resources as modern industrial cultures (the United States, Canada, Europe and Japan) representing about 20% of world's population enjoy 83% of world's wealth gleaned from nature and human labor. Meanwhile three billion people, nearly half of people in world--many of whom once lived on land now controlled by corporations--are forced to work for less than two dollars a day, hardly enough to feed themselves. In our own country, young children from Black and Latino families are suffering from high rates of asthma, lead poisoning, obesity, and nutrition-related diseases as their families are forced to live in impoverished conditions disproportionately close to toxin-belching incinerators and in urban areas classified as food deserts. How many of us consider lack of access to potable water in our own cities and world-wide, or Texas-sized mass of plastic floating in North Pacific as we drink from our bottles of spring water, often sucked out of our own aquifers and yet more expensive than gasoline? …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".