MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1964006272 · doi:10.4088/pcc.08l00751

Self-Harm Behavior Among Chronic Pain Patients

2009· article· en· W1964006272 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Randy A. Sansone, Jake Sinclair, Michael W. Wiederman

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Primary Care Companion to The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueSuicide and Self-Harm Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésChronic painHarmPsychologyClinical psychologyMedicinePsychiatrySocial psychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

To the Editor: Chronic pain is fairly prevalent in both developed and developing countries.1 However, few studies have examined self-harm behavior in this unique clinical population. Among chronic pain patients in an inpatient rehabilitation unit in a psychiatric service, Fisher and colleagues2 reported the prevalence of suicidal intent at 6.5%. In a large Canadian community sample, Ratcliffe and colleagues3 found that the presence of 1 or more chronic pain conditions was associated with both suicidal ideation and attempts. However, other forms of self-harm have received little attention (ie, we could locate no published reports in the literature). Given that the broad spectrum of self-harm behavior has received little attention in the empirical literature, in this study, we examined the prevalence of 22 self-harm behaviors in a cohort of chronic pain patients being seen by a pain specialist. Method. The study was conducted from December 2005 through August 2007. Participants were 117 general pain patients (response rate: 94.4%; 43 men, 73 women; 1 participant did not designate his or her sex) who were insured and referred to a pain management specialist by physicians predominantly in the areas of physical medicine and rehabilitation, orthopedics, and primary care. The sample ranged in age from 18 to 69 years (mean = 44.50, SD = 11.50). With regard to race/ethnicity, 105 (89.7%) were white, 6 (5.1%) Hispanic, 3 (2.6%) African American, 1 (0.9%) Asian, and 2 (1.7%) other. The majority were currently married (n = 60; 51.3%); 26 (22.2%) were never married, 26 (22.2%) were divorced, 4 (3.4%) were separated, and 1 (0.9%) was widowed. Nine (7.7%) did not graduate from high school, 25 (21.4%) graduated from high school only, 39 (33.3%) attended some college, 27 (23.1%) had a college degree, and 17 (14.5%) had a graduate degree. Each participant was recruited during his or her initial clinical evaluation for chronic pain. Each completed a research booklet that explored demographics as well as self-harm behaviors using the Self-Harm Inventory (SHI).4 The SHI is a 22-item, yes/no, self-report inventory that explores participants’ lifetime histories of self-harm behavior. Each item is preceded by the phrase, “Have you ever intentionally, or on purpose…” Items include “overdosed,” “cut yourself on purpose,” “burned yourself on purpose,” and “hit yourself.” Each endorsement is in the pathological direction, and the SHI total score is the summation of “yes” responses. The project was approved by an Institutional Review Board, and completion of the booklet was assumed to function as informed consent. Results. The number and percentage of respondents endorsing each SHI item are shown in Table 1. The number and percentage of respondents who endorsed 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 or more SHI items were 56 (47.9%), 8 (6.8%), 10 (8.5%), 9 (7.7%), 9 (7.7%), and 25 (21.4%), respectively. Note that each item was endorsed by some participants, with a substantial minority reporting the abuse of alcohol (about one third). In addition, more than 20% of the sample reported driving recklessly, being promiscuous, and engaging in emotionally abusive relationships. Finally, the prevalence rates of overdoses and suicide attempts in this cohort (7% for each) were nearly identical to the rate of “suicide intent” reported by Fisher and colleagues.2 Table 1 Rates of Endorsement of Items on the Self-Harm Inventory (SHI) (N = 117 chronic pain patients) These data indicate that, among patients with chronic pain, there are likely to be a number of aberrant behaviors, characterized by underlying themes of impulsivity and self-harm. While the relationships between pain, depression, and other potential contributory factors (eg, Axis II disorders) are not clarified by these data, there are likely to be complex associations that warrant further investigation. The potential limitations of this study include the small sample size, the self-report nature of the data, and the lack of control for pain intensity and depressive symptoms. However, this is the first study, to our knowledge, to explore a broad array of self-harm behaviors in an outpatient chronic pain population. Our findings indicate that there may be some psychopathological currents in a substantial minority.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,189
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,674

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,036
Tête enseignante GPT0,365
Écart entre enseignants0,329 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Primary Care Companion to The Journal of Clinical PsychiatryMême sujetSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesTravaux en français237 207