MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964006272 · doi:10.4088/pcc.08l00751

Self-Harm Behavior Among Chronic Pain Patients

2009· article· en· W1964006272 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Randy A. Sansone, Jake Sinclair, Michael W. Wiederman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Primary Care Companion to The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSuicide and Self-Harm Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChronic painHarmPsychologyClinical psychologyMedicinePsychiatrySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the Editor: Chronic pain is fairly prevalent in both developed and developing countries.1 However, few studies have examined self-harm behavior in this unique clinical population. Among chronic pain patients in an inpatient rehabilitation unit in a psychiatric service, Fisher and colleagues2 reported the prevalence of suicidal intent at 6.5%. In a large Canadian community sample, Ratcliffe and colleagues3 found that the presence of 1 or more chronic pain conditions was associated with both suicidal ideation and attempts. However, other forms of self-harm have received little attention (ie, we could locate no published reports in the literature). Given that the broad spectrum of self-harm behavior has received little attention in the empirical literature, in this study, we examined the prevalence of 22 self-harm behaviors in a cohort of chronic pain patients being seen by a pain specialist. Method. The study was conducted from December 2005 through August 2007. Participants were 117 general pain patients (response rate: 94.4%; 43 men, 73 women; 1 participant did not designate his or her sex) who were insured and referred to a pain management specialist by physicians predominantly in the areas of physical medicine and rehabilitation, orthopedics, and primary care. The sample ranged in age from 18 to 69 years (mean = 44.50, SD = 11.50). With regard to race/ethnicity, 105 (89.7%) were white, 6 (5.1%) Hispanic, 3 (2.6%) African American, 1 (0.9%) Asian, and 2 (1.7%) other. The majority were currently married (n = 60; 51.3%); 26 (22.2%) were never married, 26 (22.2%) were divorced, 4 (3.4%) were separated, and 1 (0.9%) was widowed. Nine (7.7%) did not graduate from high school, 25 (21.4%) graduated from high school only, 39 (33.3%) attended some college, 27 (23.1%) had a college degree, and 17 (14.5%) had a graduate degree. Each participant was recruited during his or her initial clinical evaluation for chronic pain. Each completed a research booklet that explored demographics as well as self-harm behaviors using the Self-Harm Inventory (SHI).4 The SHI is a 22-item, yes/no, self-report inventory that explores participants’ lifetime histories of self-harm behavior. Each item is preceded by the phrase, “Have you ever intentionally, or on purpose…” Items include “overdosed,” “cut yourself on purpose,” “burned yourself on purpose,” and “hit yourself.” Each endorsement is in the pathological direction, and the SHI total score is the summation of “yes” responses. The project was approved by an Institutional Review Board, and completion of the booklet was assumed to function as informed consent. Results. The number and percentage of respondents endorsing each SHI item are shown in Table 1. The number and percentage of respondents who endorsed 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 or more SHI items were 56 (47.9%), 8 (6.8%), 10 (8.5%), 9 (7.7%), 9 (7.7%), and 25 (21.4%), respectively. Note that each item was endorsed by some participants, with a substantial minority reporting the abuse of alcohol (about one third). In addition, more than 20% of the sample reported driving recklessly, being promiscuous, and engaging in emotionally abusive relationships. Finally, the prevalence rates of overdoses and suicide attempts in this cohort (7% for each) were nearly identical to the rate of “suicide intent” reported by Fisher and colleagues.2 Table 1 Rates of Endorsement of Items on the Self-Harm Inventory (SHI) (N = 117 chronic pain patients) These data indicate that, among patients with chronic pain, there are likely to be a number of aberrant behaviors, characterized by underlying themes of impulsivity and self-harm. While the relationships between pain, depression, and other potential contributory factors (eg, Axis II disorders) are not clarified by these data, there are likely to be complex associations that warrant further investigation. The potential limitations of this study include the small sample size, the self-report nature of the data, and the lack of control for pain intensity and depressive symptoms. However, this is the first study, to our knowledge, to explore a broad array of self-harm behaviors in an outpatient chronic pain population. Our findings indicate that there may be some psychopathological currents in a substantial minority.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.189
Threshold uncertainty score0.674

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Primary Care Companion to The Journal of Clinical PsychiatrySame topicSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesFrench-language works237,207