Properties and units in the clinical laboratory sciences. X. Properties and units in general clinical chemistry (Technical Report) (IFCC-IUPAC 1999)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Synopsis: A coding scheme has been prepared for general clinical chemistry. Preface The present document is part ten (X) of a series on properties and units in the clinical laboratory sciences initiated in 1987. > View series titles (view corresponding project) The size and complexity of parts III and IV are such that their lists will be presented in electronic format. This is for ease of handling and to facilitate expression of concepts in different languages. At the end, systematic terms, elaborated according to international standards and recommendations should be available in the different domains of clinical laboratory sciences. The core of the series is code value strings representing concepts, that in combination delineate and define each type of property regardless of linguistic expression, thus avoiding errors during translation between languages. Foreword and Scope Clinical Laboratory Sciences are characterised by the exacting nature of the work performed and the demand for an accurate presentation of the outcome. Further the domain is transnational, international or "global". The adherent informatics system therefore needs to identify the findings accurately and to present them with the degree of detail required. At the same time it has to facilitate the transfer over linguistic and cultural barriers without distortion or loss of clarity, in order to promote clear, unambiguous, meaningful and fully informative communication in different terminologies. The degree to which a message (such as a laboratory report) needs to be expressed in a formal, systematic language depends on the geographical, linguistic, social or professional distance between the communicating parties. The greater the distance, the greater the risk of misunderstanding. Within one laboratory, local jargon terms may be used which are usually well understood between colleagues, but which would not be sufficiently widely known for communication with the outside world. Likewise, a laboratory and its local community of users, such as hospital or community physicians, may use a "local dialect" of the language of laboratory medicine which is well understood by all concerned; but when the communication possibilities are wider, even transnational, risks of serious misunderstanding arise. The purpose of this document is to apply the IFCC-IUPAC recommended syntax structures for request and report and to create a systematic terminology which can be used as the basis for encoding laboratory messages in the domain of general clinical chemistry. This is to facilitate communication of messages about such properties through computing and telecommunication between databases, messages that contain sufficient information to allow translation from and to the required "local dialect" at each end. Each entry in the list is formed following the rules given in part I and part XI of the series. The systematic names recommended here are primarily for the purpose of unambiguous data exchange. Their use in routine language by clinician or laboratory practitioners is optional but encouraged.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,020 | 0,046 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,007 | 0,011 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,042 | 0,059 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».