Current Status of the Nutritional Guidance of Baby to Human T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma Virus Type I Carriers by Japanese Obstetricians
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In humans, breast-feeding is the major route for mother-tochild transmission of human T-cell leukemia/lymphoma virus type I (HTLV-I). HTLV-I transmission by breast milk is associated with ingestion of infected cells and can be prevented by formula-feeding [1]. Therefore, in most of the developed world, mothers with a proven HTLV-I infection should be advised not to breast-feed their babies. In our recent observation in Japan, the number of HTLV-1 carrier in Japanese pregnant women has been estimated to be 1,620 (0.16% of all pregnant women) per year [2]. Based on the guidelines for obstetrical practice in Japan, the HTLV-1 carrier should be recommended to be instructed in the following methods as alternatives to breast-feeding for the prevention of HTLV-1 vertical transmission: 1) formula feeding, 2) frozen-thawed breast milk and 3) short-term breast-feeding within the first 3 months after birth [3]. However, the current status of the nutritional guidance of baby to HTLV-1 carriers by Japanese obstetricians has not been well examined. To examine the current status of mother-to-child transmission of HTLV-I preventing in Japan, on December 2014, we requested 2,544 obstetricians that are members of Japan Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (JAOG) and directors of each obstetric facility to provide information of the strategies. Of the 2,544 obstetricians, 1,345 (52.9%) responded. In cases of pregnant woman with positive western blot (WB) test, 953 (70.9%) of the Japanese obstetricians perform the informed choice of the three methods described above, 337 (25.1%) recommend formula feeding, and six (0.4%) recommend long-term breast milk, respectively. In Japan, because the mother-to-child transmission rates under the above three methods have been reported to be both about 3% [4, 5], about 70% of Japanese obstetricians perform the informed choice of the three methods as alternatives to breast-feeding. Breastfeeding is beneficial to the health of both the infant and mother, and mothers generally believe this. Therefore, it is possible that many of the HTLV-I-carrier mothers want to choose breastfeeding as the method of feeding their infants. However, the ground studies for the transmission rates with frozen-thawed breast milk and short-term breast-feeding have not been large (n = 64 and 162 in cases of frozen-thawed breast milk and short-term breast-feeding, respectively) [4]. Therefore, we have not yet evaluated the utility of these methods precisely. It is necessary to clarify the issues by follow-up of all cases prospectively. On the other hand, it has been described that the diagnosis of HTLV-1 carriers in their children is possible at the age of ≥ 3. However, only 698 obstetricians (55.4%) of them recommend the HTLV-1 screening tests for the children of women with positive WB test when they become ≥ 3 years old. The HTLV-1 screening tests might fraught with problems of announcements and personal information; however, the results are possible to facilitate the future diagnosis of adult T-cell leukemia and HTLV-1 associated myelopathy. Therefore, it seems to be necessary to convey to the mothers about the diagnostic methods of the HTLV-1 carriers of their children. These problems will be expected to be elucidated by a nationwide prospective cohort study.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».