IDENTIFICATION OF MULTIPLE RISK FACTORS FOUND IN RECREATIONAL AND COMPETITIVE FEMALE ATHLETES
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The identification of Female Athlete Triad was first classified in 1992 as a syndrome that affected high level female athletes suffering from disordered eating, ammenorhea and osteoporosis. Through case study and literature searches, it is now becoming evident that many female athletes involved in recreational sport may also be at risk for developing one or more elements of Female Athlete Triad. As the burden of health becomes evident we must begin to examine the relevance and impact of risk factors that will assist us in early identification, evidence-based treatment and prevention programs. PURPOSE To examine and analyze the multiple risk factors related to the development and diagnosis of Female Athlete Triad as captured in a multi-disciplinary sport medicine clinic. This is a feasibility trial to establish parameters for a larger multi-centered study. METHODS This is a retrospective descriptive chart review on 21 patients who attended a sport medicine program and were identified as requiring multi-disciplinary treatment for one or more components of the Female Athlete Triad. Telephone verification interviews were conducted. Ethics approval was applied and received. Analysis on outcome measures included; demographics, injury history, BMI (body mass index), hours of training, social history, treatment interventions and body image perceptions among others. SUMMARY OF RESULTS: The prevalence of the three components of female athlete triad was not homogenous across the population: DSM-IV Eating Disorder(30%), Ammenorrhea (20%) and Decreased Bone Mineral Density or Stress Fracture(40%). An increased relative prevalence of all three disorders was associated with recreational exercise and running. Relevant risk factors for development of triad symptomotolgy included a BMI of <20 and hours of training of >20 hrs/week. The presence of injury was noted as a strong risk factor for development of disordered eating behaviours. CONCLUSION The strong presence of stress fracture without ammenorrhea or DSM-IV Eating Disorder may be a variation of Female Athlete Triad Syndrome that does not progress to involve the other components if identified and treated early. The correlation of the “20 factor” being a BMI of under 20 and over 20 hours of training per week in either recreational or competitive sport may be a “red flag” indicating further intervention and assessment is warranted. The continued support for a multifactorial etiology of Female Athlete Triad was confirmed. Further studies with larger population samples and greater sport diversity are recommended.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».