MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1966853150 · doi:10.1353/vcr.2012.0033

Phonographic Etiquette; or, “The Spirit First Moves Mister Knowles”

2012· article· en· W1966853150 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Patrick Feaster

Notice bibliographique

RevueVictorian review · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueDiverse Musicological Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPhonographEtiquetteHistoryActive listeningVisual artsArtMedia studiesLiteratureArt historyLawSociologyCommunicationEngineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Phonographic Etiquette; or, “The Spirit First Moves Mister Knowles” Patrick Feaster (bio) Nearly forty wax cylinder phonograms made in London during 1888 and preserved at Thomas Edison National Historical Park were transferred to audiotape in 1995, rendering their content available for listening and study (Gracyk 32–35). These had originally been recorded through the initiative of George Gouraud, the agent whom Edison had entrusted with promoting the phonograph in England, and several of them have attracted interest as specimens of the speech of famous individuals, notably Sir Arthur Sullivan and William Gladstone. Gouraud had announced his intention of compiling a “‘Phonogramic Album’ of the voices of the great of all nations; to include alike, some day, the voices of the living and the dead” (“First Interview”), and latter-day commentators have usually framed his spoken-word recordings in terms of that project, as fruits of an effort to document historic voices for posterity. At the time of their making, however, these recordings were anchored to novel social events designed to impress the merits of the phonograph upon contemporaneous audiences, and this aspect of their significance has not received due attention. While it is often noted that Sullivan spoke his recorded lament “that so much hideous and bad music may be put on record forever” during a dinner party at Gouraud’s home on 5 October 1888, for example, the innovative way in which this event [End Page 18] incorporated phonography is generally overlooked: pre-recorded speeches were played to coordinate live after-dinner toasts, after which Sullivan and other prominent guests conveyed messages to Edison via phonograph in response to a final toast to the inventor’s health. A transcript sent to Edison along with the cylinders is headed “The Phonograph’s first appearance in the ‘role’ of Toast-master and Speech-maker.”1 The focus of the event, then, was not the mediation of voices into the distant future, but the viability of introducing phonographic talk into all levels of contemporary social life. Gouraud’s motive for orchestrating such events has sometimes been questioned. One visitor advised Edison that Gouraud was “pushing” the phonograph “more for his own private ends socially and otherwise, than anything else” (Verity), and Peter Copeland characterizes him as “a social climber, who found the phonograph a perfect excuse to fraternize with high society in England” (45). But whatever truth might lie in these assertions, his phonographic soirees did arguably serve a purpose beyond personal aggrandizement. In 1887, Gouraud had written to Edison that “the value of such [phonographic] correspondence as may be carried on socially across the seas will, as an advertisement, be incalculable.” To promote the phonograph in this way, he needed to contrive social contexts in which eminent persons would feel obliged to speak messages into the phonograph for dispatch to America. “Gouraud’s favourite technique,” writes Walter Harris, “was to invite an interviewee to dinner, relax him with a sufficiency of wine, and present him with the recording aperture of the phonograph comfortably within reach of his mouth” (8). And yet there was more to the strategy than this, as one surviving phonogram reveals.2 Gouraud opens it as follows: Queen Ann’s Lodge November the twenty-second, eighteen hundred and eighty eight. Gouraud to Edison. As this is the first occasion—on which the phonograph—has appeared and performed—in a private house— in the great city of London, it would seem—meet and right that our host—Mister Knowles—and our hostess—and their daughters, together with the guests, should mark the event by—letting you hear, in their own voices, their own particular names. Now listen to their voices and to their names, beginning with Mister Knowles. (Queen Ann’s) These words were recorded after a dinner at the home of James Knowles, editor of the Nineteenth Century, after his guests had listened to a selection of [End Page 19] pre-recorded content. Gouraud represents the proposition that everyone present should speak into the phonograph not as a self-interested innovation on his part, but as something that “would seem meet and right,” as though the impulse were natural or grounded in long-standing tradition. Some guests were...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,386
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0220,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,159
Tête enseignante GPT0,267
Écart entre enseignants0,108 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueVictorian reviewMême sujetDiverse Musicological StudiesTravaux en français237 207