MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966853150 · doi:10.1353/vcr.2012.0033

Phonographic Etiquette; or, “The Spirit First Moves Mister Knowles”

2012· article· en· W1966853150 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Patrick Feaster

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian review · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDiverse Musicological Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhonographEtiquetteHistoryActive listeningVisual artsArtMedia studiesLiteratureArt historyLawSociologyCommunicationEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phonographic Etiquette; or, “The Spirit First Moves Mister Knowles” Patrick Feaster (bio) Nearly forty wax cylinder phonograms made in London during 1888 and preserved at Thomas Edison National Historical Park were transferred to audiotape in 1995, rendering their content available for listening and study (Gracyk 32–35). These had originally been recorded through the initiative of George Gouraud, the agent whom Edison had entrusted with promoting the phonograph in England, and several of them have attracted interest as specimens of the speech of famous individuals, notably Sir Arthur Sullivan and William Gladstone. Gouraud had announced his intention of compiling a “‘Phonogramic Album’ of the voices of the great of all nations; to include alike, some day, the voices of the living and the dead” (“First Interview”), and latter-day commentators have usually framed his spoken-word recordings in terms of that project, as fruits of an effort to document historic voices for posterity. At the time of their making, however, these recordings were anchored to novel social events designed to impress the merits of the phonograph upon contemporaneous audiences, and this aspect of their significance has not received due attention. While it is often noted that Sullivan spoke his recorded lament “that so much hideous and bad music may be put on record forever” during a dinner party at Gouraud’s home on 5 October 1888, for example, the innovative way in which this event [End Page 18] incorporated phonography is generally overlooked: pre-recorded speeches were played to coordinate live after-dinner toasts, after which Sullivan and other prominent guests conveyed messages to Edison via phonograph in response to a final toast to the inventor’s health. A transcript sent to Edison along with the cylinders is headed “The Phonograph’s first appearance in the ‘role’ of Toast-master and Speech-maker.”1 The focus of the event, then, was not the mediation of voices into the distant future, but the viability of introducing phonographic talk into all levels of contemporary social life. Gouraud’s motive for orchestrating such events has sometimes been questioned. One visitor advised Edison that Gouraud was “pushing” the phonograph “more for his own private ends socially and otherwise, than anything else” (Verity), and Peter Copeland characterizes him as “a social climber, who found the phonograph a perfect excuse to fraternize with high society in England” (45). But whatever truth might lie in these assertions, his phonographic soirees did arguably serve a purpose beyond personal aggrandizement. In 1887, Gouraud had written to Edison that “the value of such [phonographic] correspondence as may be carried on socially across the seas will, as an advertisement, be incalculable.” To promote the phonograph in this way, he needed to contrive social contexts in which eminent persons would feel obliged to speak messages into the phonograph for dispatch to America. “Gouraud’s favourite technique,” writes Walter Harris, “was to invite an interviewee to dinner, relax him with a sufficiency of wine, and present him with the recording aperture of the phonograph comfortably within reach of his mouth” (8). And yet there was more to the strategy than this, as one surviving phonogram reveals.2 Gouraud opens it as follows: Queen Ann’s Lodge November the twenty-second, eighteen hundred and eighty eight. Gouraud to Edison. As this is the first occasion—on which the phonograph—has appeared and performed—in a private house— in the great city of London, it would seem—meet and right that our host—Mister Knowles—and our hostess—and their daughters, together with the guests, should mark the event by—letting you hear, in their own voices, their own particular names. Now listen to their voices and to their names, beginning with Mister Knowles. (Queen Ann’s) These words were recorded after a dinner at the home of James Knowles, editor of the Nineteenth Century, after his guests had listened to a selection of [End Page 19] pre-recorded content. Gouraud represents the proposition that everyone present should speak into the phonograph not as a self-interested innovation on his part, but as something that “would seem meet and right,” as though the impulse were natural or grounded in long-standing tradition. Some guests were...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.386
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.159
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.108 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVictorian reviewSame topicDiverse Musicological StudiesFrench-language works237,207