200 EVALUATION OF SUPEROVULATORY REGIMES FOR IN VIVO EMBRYO PRODUCTION IN ALPACAS (LAMA PACOS)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The objective of the study was to evaluate 4 superovulatory regimes in terms of the quantity of transferable embryos recovered. A total of 48 female alpacas, 3 to 5 years of age and located at Malkini Alpacas Farm (4100 m elevation), were distributed into 4 treatments. In treatment 1, 13 female alpacas received on Day 0 an intravaginal device containing 0.78 mg of progesterone (Cue Mate®, Bioniche Animal Health, Belleville, Ontario, Canada) followed immediately by an i.m injection of estradiol (1 mg of estradiol benzoate) and an i.m. injection of PGF2a (Veyx®, 0.25 mg of cloprostenol). The intravaginal device was removed on Day 7, performing at removal time an i.m. injection of estradiol. From Days 8 to 16, the alpacas received an i.m injection twice per day and 12 hours apart of pFSH (FolltropinV®, Bioniche Animal Health) in decreasing doses totaling 420 mg of pFSH; on Day 16,300 IU of eCGi.m. (Pregnecol®, Bioniche Animal Health) was injected. In treatment 2, 13 alpacas received on Day 0 an intravaginal device of progesterone followed by an i.m. injection of PGF2; from Days 5 to 9, alpacas received injections twice per day of decreasing doses of pFSH (porcine FHS) totaling 320 mg; on Day 7, the intravaginal device was removed and 500 IU i.m. of eCG was injected. In treatment 3,13 alpacas received on Day 0 an intravaginal device of progesterone followed immediately by an i.m injection of GnRH (Conceptal®, 0.0042 mg of acetate of busereline); pFSH was injected i.m. from Days 5 to 9 in decreasing doses twice per day, totaling 440 mg; the intravaginal device was removed on Day 7. In treatment 4, 9 female alpacas received on Day 0 an i.m. injection of GnRH after verifying the presence of a preovulatory follicle (>8.0 mm diameter). On Day 2, the alpacas received 1000 IU i.m. of eCG followed on Day 7 by an i.m. injection of PGF2. In all cases, the donor alpacas were evaluated by ultrasonography. The matings for treatments 1, 2, and 3 were performed twice per donor alpaca at 12-hour intervals between Days 5 and 8 of the initiation of the pFSH treatments, whereas in treatment 4 the matings were made the following day after the application of the PGF2. In treatment 1, the donor alpacas received at time of first mating an i.m injection of 3.75 mg of LH (Lutropin®, Bioniche Animal Health); in treatments 2, 3, and 4, the donors received an i.m. injection of GnRH. In all treatments, embryo collection was performed by nonsurgical method 6.5 days after first mating. There were significant differences between treatments (P < 0.05) in the mean number of CL, with treatment 4 being the highest (4.7 ± 2.63, 4.1 ± 3.05, 1.8 ± 1.8, and 6.0 ± 3.16 for treatments 1 to 4, respectively). The total number of blastocysts recovered per treatment was 7, 16, 2, and 18 for treatments 1 to 4, respectively. The superovulatory strategy followed for treatment 4 showed to be the one resulting in the highest number of transferable embryos. Further comparative evaluations between FSH and eCG treatments are recommended. Research was partially funded by the contributions of Bioniche Animal Health.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».