200 EVALUATION OF SUPEROVULATORY REGIMES FOR IN VIVO EMBRYO PRODUCTION IN ALPACAS (LAMA PACOS)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of the study was to evaluate 4 superovulatory regimes in terms of the quantity of transferable embryos recovered. A total of 48 female alpacas, 3 to 5 years of age and located at Malkini Alpacas Farm (4100 m elevation), were distributed into 4 treatments. In treatment 1, 13 female alpacas received on Day 0 an intravaginal device containing 0.78 mg of progesterone (Cue Mate®, Bioniche Animal Health, Belleville, Ontario, Canada) followed immediately by an i.m injection of estradiol (1 mg of estradiol benzoate) and an i.m. injection of PGF2a (Veyx®, 0.25 mg of cloprostenol). The intravaginal device was removed on Day 7, performing at removal time an i.m. injection of estradiol. From Days 8 to 16, the alpacas received an i.m injection twice per day and 12 hours apart of pFSH (FolltropinV®, Bioniche Animal Health) in decreasing doses totaling 420 mg of pFSH; on Day 16,300 IU of eCGi.m. (Pregnecol®, Bioniche Animal Health) was injected. In treatment 2, 13 alpacas received on Day 0 an intravaginal device of progesterone followed by an i.m. injection of PGF2; from Days 5 to 9, alpacas received injections twice per day of decreasing doses of pFSH (porcine FHS) totaling 320 mg; on Day 7, the intravaginal device was removed and 500 IU i.m. of eCG was injected. In treatment 3,13 alpacas received on Day 0 an intravaginal device of progesterone followed immediately by an i.m injection of GnRH (Conceptal®, 0.0042 mg of acetate of busereline); pFSH was injected i.m. from Days 5 to 9 in decreasing doses twice per day, totaling 440 mg; the intravaginal device was removed on Day 7. In treatment 4, 9 female alpacas received on Day 0 an i.m. injection of GnRH after verifying the presence of a preovulatory follicle (>8.0 mm diameter). On Day 2, the alpacas received 1000 IU i.m. of eCG followed on Day 7 by an i.m. injection of PGF2. In all cases, the donor alpacas were evaluated by ultrasonography. The matings for treatments 1, 2, and 3 were performed twice per donor alpaca at 12-hour intervals between Days 5 and 8 of the initiation of the pFSH treatments, whereas in treatment 4 the matings were made the following day after the application of the PGF2. In treatment 1, the donor alpacas received at time of first mating an i.m injection of 3.75 mg of LH (Lutropin®, Bioniche Animal Health); in treatments 2, 3, and 4, the donors received an i.m. injection of GnRH. In all treatments, embryo collection was performed by nonsurgical method 6.5 days after first mating. There were significant differences between treatments (P < 0.05) in the mean number of CL, with treatment 4 being the highest (4.7 ± 2.63, 4.1 ± 3.05, 1.8 ± 1.8, and 6.0 ± 3.16 for treatments 1 to 4, respectively). The total number of blastocysts recovered per treatment was 7, 16, 2, and 18 for treatments 1 to 4, respectively. The superovulatory strategy followed for treatment 4 showed to be the one resulting in the highest number of transferable embryos. Further comparative evaluations between FSH and eCG treatments are recommended. Research was partially funded by the contributions of Bioniche Animal Health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".