Poetry and the Pre-Raphaelite Arts: Dante Gabriel Rossetti & William Morris (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Poetry and the Pre-Raphaelite Arts: Dante Gabriel Rossetti & William Morris Thomas J. Tobin (bio) Elizabeth K. Helsinger , Poetry and the Pre-Raphaelite Arts: Dante Gabriel Rossetti & William Morris (New Haven: Yale, 2008), pp. xv + 335, $50 cloth. Dante Gabriel Rossetti and William Morris have often been lionized as the leading lights of the first and second phases, respectively, of Pre-Raphaelitism, and new scholarship on their practices risks treading old ground. Elizabeth Helsinger's volume ties together the painting, poetry, and plastic arts produced by both artists. Helsinger posits their output not as an antiquarian yearning for the artistic simplicity of earlier centuries (as has often been argued), but as a modern response to the burgeoning commercial culture of mass production, industrial design, secularism, and the increasing homogeneity of Victorian-era life. Although Poetry and the Pre-Raphaelite Arts does not explicitly focus on the periodicals of the day—all but two of the fourteen mentions in the text are to the Germ and the Oxford and Cambridge Magazine—the project could not have been completed without extensive examination of the periodical record. Helsinger compares published versions of poems that appeared first in journals and magazines, follows the critical reception of paintings and poems, and demonstrates how Rossetti and Morris were perceived by their contemporaries as designers (e.g., F. G. Stephens noting in the Athenaeum Rossetti's skill as a maker of art designed to fit the tastes and rooms of wealthy clients). Helsinger's single argument convincingly encompasses what previous scholars often separated: "modern," didactic Pre-Raphaelitism that [End Page 84] addressed contemporary social issues, and a "medieval" valuing of trecento and quattrocento artists' methods as being simpler and truer. Helsinger claims that acts of close attention, patterned repetition, and translation (in both the textual and visual senses) helped Pre-Raphaelites to place themselves in dialogue with industrial developments and the commodification of their era. Rossetti and Morris created their "made" art objects—paintings, furniture, poems—to stand alongside new mass-produced items. By co-opting many of the elements of modern design, they addressed the decreasing distance between "high" and "mass" art due to the spread of reproduction techniques (etchings, photography) and the shrinking costs of book and periodical production. Helsinger's volume is a compelling argument that goes beyond Rossetti and Morris to create a window into how late-Victorian culture attempted to catch up with advances in technology and industry. Thomas J. Tobin DeVry University Thomas J. Tobin Thomas J. Tobin is a Senior Faculty member of the College of Media Arts and Technology at DeVry University, specializing in distance learning, course design, and supporting disabled learners. Tom was the RSVP webmaster 2002-2007 and Membership Chair 2003-2007. He has published Pre-Raphaelitism in the Nineteenth-Century Press (ELS, 2002) and edited the collection Worldwide Pre-Raphaelitism (SUNY, 2004). "Spreading Socialist Ideals through the William Morris Society Web Site" is forthcoming in William Morris in the Twenty-First Century (Peter Lang, 2010). Copyright © 2010 The Research Society for Victorian Periodicals
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,015 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».