MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968329718 · doi:10.1353/vpr.0.0111

Poetry and the Pre-Raphaelite Arts: Dante Gabriel Rossetti & William Morris (review)

2010· article· en· W1968329718 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Thomas J. Tobin

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian periodicals review · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt History and Market Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryPaintingThe artsArtScholarshipArt historyLiteratureVisual artsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Poetry and the Pre-Raphaelite Arts: Dante Gabriel Rossetti & William Morris Thomas J. Tobin (bio) Elizabeth K. Helsinger , Poetry and the Pre-Raphaelite Arts: Dante Gabriel Rossetti & William Morris (New Haven: Yale, 2008), pp. xv + 335, $50 cloth. Dante Gabriel Rossetti and William Morris have often been lionized as the leading lights of the first and second phases, respectively, of Pre-Raphaelitism, and new scholarship on their practices risks treading old ground. Elizabeth Helsinger's volume ties together the painting, poetry, and plastic arts produced by both artists. Helsinger posits their output not as an antiquarian yearning for the artistic simplicity of earlier centuries (as has often been argued), but as a modern response to the burgeoning commercial culture of mass production, industrial design, secularism, and the increasing homogeneity of Victorian-era life. Although Poetry and the Pre-Raphaelite Arts does not explicitly focus on the periodicals of the day—all but two of the fourteen mentions in the text are to the Germ and the Oxford and Cambridge Magazine—the project could not have been completed without extensive examination of the periodical record. Helsinger compares published versions of poems that appeared first in journals and magazines, follows the critical reception of paintings and poems, and demonstrates how Rossetti and Morris were perceived by their contemporaries as designers (e.g., F. G. Stephens noting in the Athenaeum Rossetti's skill as a maker of art designed to fit the tastes and rooms of wealthy clients). Helsinger's single argument convincingly encompasses what previous scholars often separated: "modern," didactic Pre-Raphaelitism that [End Page 84] addressed contemporary social issues, and a "medieval" valuing of trecento and quattrocento artists' methods as being simpler and truer. Helsinger claims that acts of close attention, patterned repetition, and translation (in both the textual and visual senses) helped Pre-Raphaelites to place themselves in dialogue with industrial developments and the commodification of their era. Rossetti and Morris created their "made" art objects—paintings, furniture, poems—to stand alongside new mass-produced items. By co-opting many of the elements of modern design, they addressed the decreasing distance between "high" and "mass" art due to the spread of reproduction techniques (etchings, photography) and the shrinking costs of book and periodical production. Helsinger's volume is a compelling argument that goes beyond Rossetti and Morris to create a window into how late-Victorian culture attempted to catch up with advances in technology and industry. Thomas J. Tobin DeVry University Thomas J. Tobin Thomas J. Tobin is a Senior Faculty member of the College of Media Arts and Technology at DeVry University, specializing in distance learning, course design, and supporting disabled learners. Tom was the RSVP webmaster 2002-2007 and Membership Chair 2003-2007. He has published Pre-Raphaelitism in the Nineteenth-Century Press (ELS, 2002) and edited the collection Worldwide Pre-Raphaelitism (SUNY, 2004). "Spreading Socialist Ideals through the William Morris Society Web Site" is forthcoming in William Morris in the Twenty-First Century (Peter Lang, 2010). Copyright © 2010 The Research Society for Victorian Periodicals

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVictorian periodicals reviewSame topicArt History and Market AnalysisFrench-language works237,207