Comparison of Three Different Supercharging Procedures in a Rat Skin Flap Model
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A significant clinical problem in reconstructive surgery is partial loss of a pedicled flap. To resolve this problem, various methods of vascular augmentation have been developed; "supercharging" is one of those techniques. A new rat flap model was developed for investigation of the supercharging procedure, and the efficacy of the arterial supercharging method was examined. The purpose of this study was to investigate how an arterial supercharging procedure could generate large flap survival areas with different supercharging positions in rats. On the basis of the vascular anatomical features of rats, a circumferential skin flap from the lower abdomen to the back, measuring 4 x 12 cm, was marked. The flap was divided along the dorsal midline. Forty rats were divided into four experimental groups, as follows: group 1 (control), flaps based only on the deep circumflex iliac artery and vein; group 2, flaps supercharged with the ipsilateral superficial inferior epigastric artery; group 3, flaps supercharged with the contralateral superficial inferior epigastric artery; group 4, flaps supercharged with the contralateral deep circumflex iliac artery. On the fourth postoperative day, the flaps were evaluated with measurements of necrosis and survival areas. Microfil (Flow Tech, Inc., Carver, Mass.) was then injected manually throughout the body, and the vascular changes produced by supercharging were angiographically evaluated. Compared with group 1 (control), the flap survival areas were significantly greater in distally supercharged flaps in groups 3 and 4 (mean flap survival, 91.2 +/- 5.2 percent and 90.5 +/- 10.6 percent, respectively; p < 0.001) and in proximally supercharged flaps in group 2 (45.9 +/- 4.1 percent, p < 0.05). Angiographic assessment of the flaps that survived completely revealed marked dilation of the choke veins among the territories and reorientation of dilated veins along the axes of the flaps. This study suggests that distal arterial supercharging (contralateral superficial inferior epigastric artery or contralateral deep circumflex iliac artery) is more effective than proximal arterial supercharging (ipsilateral superficial inferior epigastric artery) in increasing flap survival. Although the rat skin flap may not be analogous to human flaps, distal arterial supercharging might have useful therapeutic potential in increasing flap survival in clinical practice.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle