Comparison of Three Different Supercharging Procedures in a Rat Skin Flap Model
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A significant clinical problem in reconstructive surgery is partial loss of a pedicled flap. To resolve this problem, various methods of vascular augmentation have been developed; "supercharging" is one of those techniques. A new rat flap model was developed for investigation of the supercharging procedure, and the efficacy of the arterial supercharging method was examined. The purpose of this study was to investigate how an arterial supercharging procedure could generate large flap survival areas with different supercharging positions in rats. On the basis of the vascular anatomical features of rats, a circumferential skin flap from the lower abdomen to the back, measuring 4 x 12 cm, was marked. The flap was divided along the dorsal midline. Forty rats were divided into four experimental groups, as follows: group 1 (control), flaps based only on the deep circumflex iliac artery and vein; group 2, flaps supercharged with the ipsilateral superficial inferior epigastric artery; group 3, flaps supercharged with the contralateral superficial inferior epigastric artery; group 4, flaps supercharged with the contralateral deep circumflex iliac artery. On the fourth postoperative day, the flaps were evaluated with measurements of necrosis and survival areas. Microfil (Flow Tech, Inc., Carver, Mass.) was then injected manually throughout the body, and the vascular changes produced by supercharging were angiographically evaluated. Compared with group 1 (control), the flap survival areas were significantly greater in distally supercharged flaps in groups 3 and 4 (mean flap survival, 91.2 +/- 5.2 percent and 90.5 +/- 10.6 percent, respectively; p < 0.001) and in proximally supercharged flaps in group 2 (45.9 +/- 4.1 percent, p < 0.05). Angiographic assessment of the flaps that survived completely revealed marked dilation of the choke veins among the territories and reorientation of dilated veins along the axes of the flaps. This study suggests that distal arterial supercharging (contralateral superficial inferior epigastric artery or contralateral deep circumflex iliac artery) is more effective than proximal arterial supercharging (ipsilateral superficial inferior epigastric artery) in increasing flap survival. Although the rat skin flap may not be analogous to human flaps, distal arterial supercharging might have useful therapeutic potential in increasing flap survival in clinical practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it