New Worlds, New Lives: Globalization and People of Japanese Descent in the Americas and from Latin America in Japan (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: New Worlds, New Lives: Globalization and People of Japanese Descent in the Americas and from Latin America in Japan Yoshikuni Igarashi New Worlds, New Lives: Globalization and People of Japanese Descent in the Americas and from Latin America in Japan. Edited by Lane Ryo Hirabayashi, Akemi Kikumura-Yano and James A. Hirabayashi . Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002. New Worlds, New Lives: Globalization and People of Japanese Descent in the Americas and from Latin America in Japan is a product of the International Nikkei Research Project's (INRP) effort to document the Nikkei's experiences in diverse social and geographical contexts. The concept of Nikkei is broadly defined as "people of Japanese descent living outside Japan"(xiii) and serves as the conceptual ground in which individual participants engage in their case studies about specific geographical regions and/or theoretical issues. The resulting collection is an impressive compilation of information concerning Nikkei experiences in the past century. However, there seems to be an uneasy tension within the volume between its mandate to be comprehensive and the editors' scholarly intention to be focused. In the end, the editors accommodate the book's overall goal to be comprehensive by refraining from editorially intervening in each essay. Unfortunately, this absence of consistent editorial presence ultimately makes it extremely difficult to appreciate the complex picture that the volume as a whole portrays. The essays not only discuss empirical cases but also address the larger theoretical implications of these cases. The collection indeed covers diverse regions (Brazil, Peru, Bolivia, the United States, Canada, Argentina, and Japan) and concerns itself with various issues relevant to Nikkei communities (education, national identity, generational gap, gender tension, Okinawan legacies, dekasegi—the Nikkei who seek temporary employment in Japan, etc.). Many individual contributors draw on theories emergent from their respective disciplines as they [End Page 326] offer fascinating insights into the complex history of Nikkei experiences. Jeffrey Lesser examines Brazilian Nikkei's struggles to establish their own place against Brazil's drastically changing political climate. Resonating with other essays that testify to the diversity of the Nikkei, Lesser emphasizes the competing strategies employed to construct Japanese-Brazilian identities. Doris Moromisato Miasato and Naomi Hoki Moniz similarly remind the reader of the existence and impact of competing interests within Nikkei communities by examining the gender issues in Nikkei history. They show that though largely excluded from the Nikkei's formal organizations, women have been important agents in Nikkei identity formation. Such testimonies to Nikkei diversity and Nikkei struggles to carve out their own spaces in host countries are augmented by the discussions of other topics as well. Makoto Arakaki investigates the negotiation of boundaries between Okinawans and mainlanders in Nikkei communities. Edoson Mori, Masao Ninomiya, Marcelo G. Higa, and Yasuko I. Takazawa examine various aspects of the dekasegi phenomenon. And, differences stemming from generational shifts and from the timings of arrival to host counties are the backdrop against which Kozy Amemiya examines Nikkei efforts to commemorate their historical experiences in the Santa Cruz region of Bolivia. Individual contributors to this volume tackle the difficult task of incorporating empirical data while offering interesting perspectives on the cases they discuss. However, the constraints placed on them ultimately prevent their essays from fully realizing their potential: There is simply not enough space allocated for each essay. The three short sectional introductions and twenty articles are tightly fitted into 346 pages. At average (after subtracting the pages for the short introductions), each essay has merely 16 printed pages to introduce, develop topic(s) and to conclude as well as to provide proper citations (some essays have extensive notes). Given the complexity of the issues the contributors try to analyze and their desire to be as comprehensive as possible in doing so, this is not nearly enough space: the volume's constitutive pieces consequently read more like encyclopedia entries than critical essays. Furthermore, the essays are burdened with the task of representing either geographical regions and/or theoretical issues. The overarching structure of the volume, albeit not expressed explicitly as such, is to place each contributor's discussion within a nomenclature of knowledge concerning Nikkei experiences. Harumi Befu's effort to categorize the Nikkei into eight...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».