MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971908616 · doi:10.1353/jaas.2004.0018

New Worlds, New Lives: Globalization and People of Japanese Descent in the Americas and from Latin America in Japan (review)

2003· article· en· W1971908616 on OpenAlex
Yoshikuni Igarashi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Asian American Studies · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPhilippine History and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLatin AmericansGlobalizationDescent (aeronautics)Social worldsPolitical scienceSociologyHistoryGeographySocial scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: New Worlds, New Lives: Globalization and People of Japanese Descent in the Americas and from Latin America in Japan Yoshikuni Igarashi New Worlds, New Lives: Globalization and People of Japanese Descent in the Americas and from Latin America in Japan. Edited by Lane Ryo Hirabayashi, Akemi Kikumura-Yano and James A. Hirabayashi . Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002. New Worlds, New Lives: Globalization and People of Japanese Descent in the Americas and from Latin America in Japan is a product of the International Nikkei Research Project's (INRP) effort to document the Nikkei's experiences in diverse social and geographical contexts. The concept of Nikkei is broadly defined as "people of Japanese descent living outside Japan"(xiii) and serves as the conceptual ground in which individual participants engage in their case studies about specific geographical regions and/or theoretical issues. The resulting collection is an impressive compilation of information concerning Nikkei experiences in the past century. However, there seems to be an uneasy tension within the volume between its mandate to be comprehensive and the editors' scholarly intention to be focused. In the end, the editors accommodate the book's overall goal to be comprehensive by refraining from editorially intervening in each essay. Unfortunately, this absence of consistent editorial presence ultimately makes it extremely difficult to appreciate the complex picture that the volume as a whole portrays. The essays not only discuss empirical cases but also address the larger theoretical implications of these cases. The collection indeed covers diverse regions (Brazil, Peru, Bolivia, the United States, Canada, Argentina, and Japan) and concerns itself with various issues relevant to Nikkei communities (education, national identity, generational gap, gender tension, Okinawan legacies, dekasegi—the Nikkei who seek temporary employment in Japan, etc.). Many individual contributors draw on theories emergent from their respective disciplines as they [End Page 326] offer fascinating insights into the complex history of Nikkei experiences. Jeffrey Lesser examines Brazilian Nikkei's struggles to establish their own place against Brazil's drastically changing political climate. Resonating with other essays that testify to the diversity of the Nikkei, Lesser emphasizes the competing strategies employed to construct Japanese-Brazilian identities. Doris Moromisato Miasato and Naomi Hoki Moniz similarly remind the reader of the existence and impact of competing interests within Nikkei communities by examining the gender issues in Nikkei history. They show that though largely excluded from the Nikkei's formal organizations, women have been important agents in Nikkei identity formation. Such testimonies to Nikkei diversity and Nikkei struggles to carve out their own spaces in host countries are augmented by the discussions of other topics as well. Makoto Arakaki investigates the negotiation of boundaries between Okinawans and mainlanders in Nikkei communities. Edoson Mori, Masao Ninomiya, Marcelo G. Higa, and Yasuko I. Takazawa examine various aspects of the dekasegi phenomenon. And, differences stemming from generational shifts and from the timings of arrival to host counties are the backdrop against which Kozy Amemiya examines Nikkei efforts to commemorate their historical experiences in the Santa Cruz region of Bolivia. Individual contributors to this volume tackle the difficult task of incorporating empirical data while offering interesting perspectives on the cases they discuss. However, the constraints placed on them ultimately prevent their essays from fully realizing their potential: There is simply not enough space allocated for each essay. The three short sectional introductions and twenty articles are tightly fitted into 346 pages. At average (after subtracting the pages for the short introductions), each essay has merely 16 printed pages to introduce, develop topic(s) and to conclude as well as to provide proper citations (some essays have extensive notes). Given the complexity of the issues the contributors try to analyze and their desire to be as comprehensive as possible in doing so, this is not nearly enough space: the volume's constitutive pieces consequently read more like encyclopedia entries than critical essays. Furthermore, the essays are burdened with the task of representing either geographical regions and/or theoretical issues. The overarching structure of the volume, albeit not expressed explicitly as such, is to place each contributor's discussion within a nomenclature of knowledge concerning Nikkei experiences. Harumi Befu's effort to categorize the Nikkei into eight...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.187
Threshold uncertainty score0.800

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it