MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1972232159 · doi:10.1353/nin.2001.0059

The American Church of Baseball and the National Baseball Hall of Fame

2001· article· en· W1972232159 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Roberta Newman

Notice bibliographique

RevueNine · 2001
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican Sports and Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésWorshipLeagueFootballReligious studiesHistoryLawArtPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The American Church of Baseball and the National Baseball Hall of Fame Roberta Newman (bio) It has been noted that Americans, residents of the great secular state, are among the most religious people in the world. However, by design, the United States, home of the devout, has no official state religion. There is no Church of America. What, then, takes the place of a national religion, a monolithic church with a single unifying doctrine? In this country, where the secular is frequently imbued with religious significance, baseball, the national pastime, may be said to serve as the American religion. Indeed, our vocabulary is filled with references likening baseball and the places it is played to religion and religious practice. Discredited for its epic inaccuracies, Alfred Goodwill Spalding's Base Ball: America's National Game is nevertheless advertised as "baseball's first Bible," and its author as "the baseball messiah."1 The great, old ballparks, both those still standing and the mythic homes of long departed teams, are spoken of with the awe generally reserved for the great cathedrals of Europe. They are our Green Cathedrals. The modern, luxurious retro-stadiums, and even the domed monstrosities of the 1970s, with their artificial turf and football seating, are thought of as temples to the sport. And they are not alone. Every Minor League stadium, every little league diamond, serves as somebody's place of worship. But if ballparks are our churches, where is our Vatican, our Salt Lake City, our Canterbury Cathedral? It is possible to suggest that the offices of Major League Baseball, the professional sport's governing body, are the administrative center of the American religion, and the commissioner, the Pope? But to take this stance is to suggest that the spiritual center of our religion is not open to the average worshiper. Though Major League Baseball, as an organization, may dictate doctrine, its offices do not serve as a large-scale sacred space. In this respect, the National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum in Cooperstown is baseball's Vatican, baseball's Canterbury Cathedral, baseball's Mormon Tabernacle, a central place, open equally to every worshiper, no matter what his [End Page 46] or her local affiliation may be, where all of baseball's devout are on equal ground. And just as droves of pilgrims flock to the holy sites of their religions, so too do they flock to Cooperstown, to observe the relics of baseball's saints and martyrs. Simply stating that baseball is our American religion and Cooperstown is its spiritual center is one thing; calling baseball truly sacred is another. Unlike virtually every author on the subject, I will not invoke Bull Durham's Annie Savoy's opening soliloquy as proof that baseball is a bona fide religion. Instead, I will refer to an article by Frank Hall, which states that the analogy between baseball and religion is limited. While baseball, with all its rituals and ceremonies, certainly mirrors religion, it lacks a metaphysics. It may have saints and heroes, but baseball has no real sense of the divine.2 In order for baseball to be a religion, Hall suggests, it must include in its cosmology a concept of the afterlife. However, there are other ways to look at it. As early as 1919, hardly a banner year for professional baseball, the French theologian and philosopher Morris Raphael Cohen noted that the sport offers us, as Americans, "redemption from the limitations of our petty lives and the mystic unity with a larger life of which we are a part."3 Of the group worship that leads to this redemption and mystic unity, A. Bartlett Giamatti, a Renaissance scholar well versed in the European theological tradition, as well as having been one of our more esteemed popes, writes, "Here we are led to America's moral hunger for egalitarian collectivity which impels us as individuals to aggregate and invest the aggregation with numinous meaning, over and over again, as if for the first time every time."4 This statement may be said to serve as an example of the theory suggested by social scientist W. I. Thomas and referred to as the definition of the situation, which...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,055
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,182

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0060,001
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0000,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0550,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,227
Écart entre enseignants0,214 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations9
Publié2001
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNineMême sujetAmerican Sports and LiteratureTravaux en français237 207