MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1972232159 · doi:10.1353/nin.2001.0059

The American Church of Baseball and the National Baseball Hall of Fame

2001· article· en· W1972232159 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Roberta Newman

Bibliographic record

VenueNine · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Sports and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorshipLeagueFootballReligious studiesHistoryLawArtPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The American Church of Baseball and the National Baseball Hall of Fame Roberta Newman (bio) It has been noted that Americans, residents of the great secular state, are among the most religious people in the world. However, by design, the United States, home of the devout, has no official state religion. There is no Church of America. What, then, takes the place of a national religion, a monolithic church with a single unifying doctrine? In this country, where the secular is frequently imbued with religious significance, baseball, the national pastime, may be said to serve as the American religion. Indeed, our vocabulary is filled with references likening baseball and the places it is played to religion and religious practice. Discredited for its epic inaccuracies, Alfred Goodwill Spalding's Base Ball: America's National Game is nevertheless advertised as "baseball's first Bible," and its author as "the baseball messiah."1 The great, old ballparks, both those still standing and the mythic homes of long departed teams, are spoken of with the awe generally reserved for the great cathedrals of Europe. They are our Green Cathedrals. The modern, luxurious retro-stadiums, and even the domed monstrosities of the 1970s, with their artificial turf and football seating, are thought of as temples to the sport. And they are not alone. Every Minor League stadium, every little league diamond, serves as somebody's place of worship. But if ballparks are our churches, where is our Vatican, our Salt Lake City, our Canterbury Cathedral? It is possible to suggest that the offices of Major League Baseball, the professional sport's governing body, are the administrative center of the American religion, and the commissioner, the Pope? But to take this stance is to suggest that the spiritual center of our religion is not open to the average worshiper. Though Major League Baseball, as an organization, may dictate doctrine, its offices do not serve as a large-scale sacred space. In this respect, the National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum in Cooperstown is baseball's Vatican, baseball's Canterbury Cathedral, baseball's Mormon Tabernacle, a central place, open equally to every worshiper, no matter what his [End Page 46] or her local affiliation may be, where all of baseball's devout are on equal ground. And just as droves of pilgrims flock to the holy sites of their religions, so too do they flock to Cooperstown, to observe the relics of baseball's saints and martyrs. Simply stating that baseball is our American religion and Cooperstown is its spiritual center is one thing; calling baseball truly sacred is another. Unlike virtually every author on the subject, I will not invoke Bull Durham's Annie Savoy's opening soliloquy as proof that baseball is a bona fide religion. Instead, I will refer to an article by Frank Hall, which states that the analogy between baseball and religion is limited. While baseball, with all its rituals and ceremonies, certainly mirrors religion, it lacks a metaphysics. It may have saints and heroes, but baseball has no real sense of the divine.2 In order for baseball to be a religion, Hall suggests, it must include in its cosmology a concept of the afterlife. However, there are other ways to look at it. As early as 1919, hardly a banner year for professional baseball, the French theologian and philosopher Morris Raphael Cohen noted that the sport offers us, as Americans, "redemption from the limitations of our petty lives and the mystic unity with a larger life of which we are a part."3 Of the group worship that leads to this redemption and mystic unity, A. Bartlett Giamatti, a Renaissance scholar well versed in the European theological tradition, as well as having been one of our more esteemed popes, writes, "Here we are led to America's moral hunger for egalitarian collectivity which impels us as individuals to aggregate and invest the aggregation with numinous meaning, over and over again, as if for the first time every time."4 This statement may be said to serve as an example of the theory suggested by social scientist W. I. Thomas and referred to as the definition of the situation, which...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.182

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0550.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNineSame topicAmerican Sports and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207