MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W197647730

Cobb as Role Model: Ty Cobb in Juvenile Periodical Literature: 1907-29. (Articles)

2003· article· en· W197647730 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ted Hathaway

Notice bibliographique

RevueNine · 2003
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican Sports and Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCobBGreatnessFanaticismOffensiveHatredPsychologyLawSocial psychologyPolitical scienceEconomicsPoliticsManagement
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Ty Cobb's image is pretty well set now in the minds of most fans and baseball writers alike. Despite efforts at rehabilitation, such as Richard Bak's recent biography, Ty Cobb: His Tumultuous Life and Times, the usual depiction of Cobb fits more closely with either the malevolent visage of Tommy Lee Jones or the words of a drunken, raving bigot streaming from the pages of Al Stump. (1) If Cobb's greatness is acknowledged, it is often done so grudgingly. A few years back Daniel Okrent suggested that the stain Cobb the man brought to the game was perhaps too high a price to pay for his greatness as a player; that perhaps it would have been better had we never had him at all. (2) The stories of Cobb's violence, bigotry, hatred, paranoia, greed, and drunkenness are well known now and will not be described here. Many of these aspects of his behavior and personality were not unknown even during his playing career, although the precipitous decline in Cobb's celebrity stock can probably be dated to Stump's famous 1961 article in True magazine. (3) While Stump, and later others, revealed much about Cobb's dark nature, the reception these revelations received had as much to do with our current culture as with the knowledge of Cobb's many shortcomings. In Cobb's own time these shortcomings were seen differently. Cobb's achievements as a player were of much higher importance, so much so that his transgressions were downplayed or even ignored by many writers, particularly those who wrote about sports for children. For many writers Cobb was held up as the game's quintessential role model. The issue of athletes as role models is controversial. Journalists and other writers have often claimed a need for athletes to act as positive examples for admiring young people. But many athletes will have none of this and, perhaps, with good reason. Several years ago Charles Barkley stated flatly, Just because I can dunk a basketball doesn't mean I should raise your kids. (4) Considering what professional athletes actually do--play games for money--one might wonder what significance the heroics of someone like Cal Ripken actually have for anyone, let alone children. Yet it might be argued that the focus and commitment of Charles Barkley to developing his skills, or the dedication of Cal Ripken to supporting his team and playing the game, could well serve to motivate youngsters, even in areas unrelated to sport. The sociologist Harry Edwards wrote that the idea that athletes might serve as role models grows from the public's erroneous assumption that it shares with its athletic heroes a common set of value ideals, that the great athlete must somehow also be a great human being. (5) On the other hand economist Tyler Cowen recently asserted that the whole modern concept of celebrity has by now largely been separated from assessments of merit, that the public no longer looks to the famous as models for virtue or behavior. (6) Old assumptions about greatness have been turned on their heads. Thus dreadful individuals, such as Allen Iverson, are lionized, and even athletes of doubtful accomplishment, such as Deion Sanders, manage to maintain their grasp on the golden ring of fame. A few years ago writers, including Roger Angell, sang praises to Mark McGwire for saving baseball through his exciting pursuit and eventual conquering of Maris's home run record. (7) The same adulation certainly did not attend Bonds as he in tu rn broke McGwire's record. Bonds has been vilified for years as a selfish, arrogant individual, yet many young people admire him. With such athletes serving as heroes for our young people, one might wonder why Cobb is so roundly despised. ANTIHEROES These modern athletes are better called antiheroes--a reflection of the American admiration for the maverick, the nonconformist. Cobb was surely a maverick as well, but his racism and violent behavior are now met with opprobrium, not admiration. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,169
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,337

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0030,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0180,007
Communication savante0,0100,007
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0300,008

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,211
Écart entre enseignants0,202 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2003
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNineMême sujetAmerican Sports and LiteratureTravaux en français237 207