MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W197647730

Cobb as Role Model: Ty Cobb in Juvenile Periodical Literature: 1907-29. (Articles)

2003· article· en· W197647730 on OpenAlex
Ted Hathaway

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueNine · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Sports and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCobBGreatnessFanaticismOffensiveHatredPsychologyLawSocial psychologyPolitical scienceEconomicsPoliticsManagement
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ty Cobb's image is pretty well set now in the minds of most fans and baseball writers alike. Despite efforts at rehabilitation, such as Richard Bak's recent biography, Ty Cobb: His Tumultuous Life and Times, the usual depiction of Cobb fits more closely with either the malevolent visage of Tommy Lee Jones or the words of a drunken, raving bigot streaming from the pages of Al Stump. (1) If Cobb's greatness is acknowledged, it is often done so grudgingly. A few years back Daniel Okrent suggested that the stain Cobb the man brought to the game was perhaps too high a price to pay for his greatness as a player; that perhaps it would have been better had we never had him at all. (2) The stories of Cobb's violence, bigotry, hatred, paranoia, greed, and drunkenness are well known now and will not be described here. Many of these aspects of his behavior and personality were not unknown even during his playing career, although the precipitous decline in Cobb's celebrity stock can probably be dated to Stump's famous 1961 article in True magazine. (3) While Stump, and later others, revealed much about Cobb's dark nature, the reception these revelations received had as much to do with our current culture as with the knowledge of Cobb's many shortcomings. In Cobb's own time these shortcomings were seen differently. Cobb's achievements as a player were of much higher importance, so much so that his transgressions were downplayed or even ignored by many writers, particularly those who wrote about sports for children. For many writers Cobb was held up as the game's quintessential role model. The issue of athletes as role models is controversial. Journalists and other writers have often claimed a need for athletes to act as positive examples for admiring young people. But many athletes will have none of this and, perhaps, with good reason. Several years ago Charles Barkley stated flatly, Just because I can dunk a basketball doesn't mean I should raise your kids. (4) Considering what professional athletes actually do--play games for money--one might wonder what significance the heroics of someone like Cal Ripken actually have for anyone, let alone children. Yet it might be argued that the focus and commitment of Charles Barkley to developing his skills, or the dedication of Cal Ripken to supporting his team and playing the game, could well serve to motivate youngsters, even in areas unrelated to sport. The sociologist Harry Edwards wrote that the idea that athletes might serve as role models grows from the public's erroneous assumption that it shares with its athletic heroes a common set of value ideals, that the great athlete must somehow also be a great human being. (5) On the other hand economist Tyler Cowen recently asserted that the whole modern concept of celebrity has by now largely been separated from assessments of merit, that the public no longer looks to the famous as models for virtue or behavior. (6) Old assumptions about greatness have been turned on their heads. Thus dreadful individuals, such as Allen Iverson, are lionized, and even athletes of doubtful accomplishment, such as Deion Sanders, manage to maintain their grasp on the golden ring of fame. A few years ago writers, including Roger Angell, sang praises to Mark McGwire for saving baseball through his exciting pursuit and eventual conquering of Maris's home run record. (7) The same adulation certainly did not attend Bonds as he in tu rn broke McGwire's record. Bonds has been vilified for years as a selfish, arrogant individual, yet many young people admire him. With such athletes serving as heroes for our young people, one might wonder why Cobb is so roundly despised. ANTIHEROES These modern athletes are better called antiheroes--a reflection of the American admiration for the maverick, the nonconformist. Cobb was surely a maverick as well, but his racism and violent behavior are now met with opprobrium, not admiration. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.905
Threshold uncertainty score0.968

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it