MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1977309199 · doi:10.1071/ar06145

Cereal rust control in Canada

2007· article· en· W1977309199 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Brent McCallum, T. Fetch, J. Chong

Notice bibliographique

RevueAustralian Journal of Agricultural Research · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Établissements canadiensAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésStem rustPucciniaCultivarBiologyRust (programming language)AgronomyPopulationResistance (ecology)HorticultureMildewDemography

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The major cereal crops grown in Canada are wheat (11 Mha), barley (4 Mha), and oat (1.5 Mha). Over 90% of the total cereal production area is in the western provinces of Manitoba, Saskatchewan,and Alberta. Historically, the disease of major concern in wheat was stem rust, caused by Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici. The first significant stem rust resistant cultivar in Canada was Thatcher, grown extensively from 1939 until the early 1970s. The stem rust resistance in Thatcher was relatively effective, with the exception of susceptibility to race 15B epidemic in the 1950s. Thatcher, however, was very susceptible to leaf rust, caused by Puccinia triticina. Over time, improved resistance to both stem and leaf rust was achieved with the release of cultivars with additional genes for resistance, primarily Sr2, Sr6, Sr7a, Sr9b, Lr13, Lr14a, Lr16, and Lr34. Over the years genetic resistance has adequately controlled stem rust but leaf rust continues to cause significant losses, partially due to changes in the P. triticina population which reduced the effectiveness of resistance genes such as Lr13 and Lr16. Stripe rust on wheat, caused by Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici, was historically a problem under irrigation in southern Alberta, but since 2000 it has been found annually in the central Canadian prairies and southern Ontario. The genetic basis of resistance to stripe rust in most Canadian wheat cultivars has not been determined, although Yr18 provides partial resistance in many cultivars. In contrast to wheat, rust diseases have generally not caused concern for barley producers. Stem rust, caused by P. graminis f. sp. tritici, is the primary concern for barley growers, and has been controlled through use of gene Rpg1 since 1947. In 1988 race QCCJ with virulence on Rpg1 was detected in the prairie region but to date has not caused significant economic losses in barley. The resistance gene rpg4 is effective against QCCJ, but no commercial varieties have yet been produced with rpg4. In oat, both stem rust, caused by Puccinia graminis f. sp. avenae, and crown rust, caused by Puccinia coronata f. sp. avenae, have caused significant yield losses. Both rusts have been controlled mainly through host resistance and early planting. Stem rust resistance genes Pg2 and Pg13 have been the most effective and occur in many current oat cultivars. However, in 1998, 2 races, NA67 and NA76, with virulence on both Pg2 and Pg13 were detected in the prairie region. Currently, race NA67 is predominant in the prairie region and thus all Canadian cultivars are susceptible to stem rust. Since the 1980s, improved resistance to crown rust has been achieved through use of resistance derived from Avena sterilis. Pc39 was the first of the genes derived from this wild relative to be deployed in a new cultivar, followed by the release of cultivars possessing both Pc38 and Pc39. These 2 genes remained effective until the early 1990s. From 1994 onward, a series of cultivars with the highly effective Pc68 gene introgressed from A. sterilis were released. Virulence to Pc68 appeared in 2001, and in 2005 cultivars with this gene were severely rusted. The cultivar Leggett with Pc68 plus the highly effective Pc94 gene from the diploid A. strigosa was released in 2004. Rhamnus cathartica, the alternate host of P. coronata, is widespread in Canada and removal of these woody shrubs in the vicinity of oat fields is important to reduce the severity of crown rust. The increased use of fungicides on all cereals in the past 10 years has been fairly effective in rust control but represents an added input cost for producers.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,821
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,667

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,061
Tête enseignante GPT0,306
Écart entre enseignants0,244 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations119
Publié2007
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAustralian Journal of Agricultural ResearchMême sujetWheat and Barley Genetics and PathologyTravaux en français237 207