MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977309199 · doi:10.1071/ar06145

Cereal rust control in Canada

2007· article· en· W1977309199 on OpenAlexaffabout
Brent McCallum, T. Fetch, J. Chong

Bibliographic record

VenueAustralian Journal of Agricultural Research · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStem rustPucciniaCultivarBiologyRust (programming language)AgronomyPopulationResistance (ecology)HorticultureMildewDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The major cereal crops grown in Canada are wheat (11 Mha), barley (4 Mha), and oat (1.5 Mha). Over 90% of the total cereal production area is in the western provinces of Manitoba, Saskatchewan,and Alberta. Historically, the disease of major concern in wheat was stem rust, caused by Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici. The first significant stem rust resistant cultivar in Canada was Thatcher, grown extensively from 1939 until the early 1970s. The stem rust resistance in Thatcher was relatively effective, with the exception of susceptibility to race 15B epidemic in the 1950s. Thatcher, however, was very susceptible to leaf rust, caused by Puccinia triticina. Over time, improved resistance to both stem and leaf rust was achieved with the release of cultivars with additional genes for resistance, primarily Sr2, Sr6, Sr7a, Sr9b, Lr13, Lr14a, Lr16, and Lr34. Over the years genetic resistance has adequately controlled stem rust but leaf rust continues to cause significant losses, partially due to changes in the P. triticina population which reduced the effectiveness of resistance genes such as Lr13 and Lr16. Stripe rust on wheat, caused by Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici, was historically a problem under irrigation in southern Alberta, but since 2000 it has been found annually in the central Canadian prairies and southern Ontario. The genetic basis of resistance to stripe rust in most Canadian wheat cultivars has not been determined, although Yr18 provides partial resistance in many cultivars. In contrast to wheat, rust diseases have generally not caused concern for barley producers. Stem rust, caused by P. graminis f. sp. tritici, is the primary concern for barley growers, and has been controlled through use of gene Rpg1 since 1947. In 1988 race QCCJ with virulence on Rpg1 was detected in the prairie region but to date has not caused significant economic losses in barley. The resistance gene rpg4 is effective against QCCJ, but no commercial varieties have yet been produced with rpg4. In oat, both stem rust, caused by Puccinia graminis f. sp. avenae, and crown rust, caused by Puccinia coronata f. sp. avenae, have caused significant yield losses. Both rusts have been controlled mainly through host resistance and early planting. Stem rust resistance genes Pg2 and Pg13 have been the most effective and occur in many current oat cultivars. However, in 1998, 2 races, NA67 and NA76, with virulence on both Pg2 and Pg13 were detected in the prairie region. Currently, race NA67 is predominant in the prairie region and thus all Canadian cultivars are susceptible to stem rust. Since the 1980s, improved resistance to crown rust has been achieved through use of resistance derived from Avena sterilis. Pc39 was the first of the genes derived from this wild relative to be deployed in a new cultivar, followed by the release of cultivars possessing both Pc38 and Pc39. These 2 genes remained effective until the early 1990s. From 1994 onward, a series of cultivars with the highly effective Pc68 gene introgressed from A. sterilis were released. Virulence to Pc68 appeared in 2001, and in 2005 cultivars with this gene were severely rusted. The cultivar Leggett with Pc68 plus the highly effective Pc94 gene from the diploid A. strigosa was released in 2004. Rhamnus cathartica, the alternate host of P. coronata, is widespread in Canada and removal of these woody shrubs in the vicinity of oat fields is important to reduce the severity of crown rust. The increased use of fungicides on all cereals in the past 10 years has been fairly effective in rust control but represents an added input cost for producers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.821
Threshold uncertainty score0.667

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations119
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAustralian Journal of Agricultural ResearchSame topicWheat and Barley Genetics and PathologyFrench-language works237,207