Critical Pedagogy and Personal Struggles: Feminist Scholarship outside Women's Studies.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This article was inspired by our attempts to impact student responses to feminist theorizing in a third-year social psychology course. It was grounded in our participant observation, over a three-year period, as instructors at York University in Toronto, Canada. In our respective roles as professor and tutorial assistant, we, Debra and Deborah, enjoyed a friendly, collegial relationship that was characterized by a collaborative approach to and research. In our experience in a university setting1 we had seen how infiltration of feminist ideas into nonfeminist courses was met with hostility from many students.2 We wanted to enhance course experience, not only for disgruntled students, but also for ourselves. As noted by Robert Menzies and Dorothy E. Chunn, The lecture podium can be a lonely place at best of times, and anti-feminist resistance can be devastating (68). During three years we describe here, we implemented a number of pedagogical techniques to facilitate and learning of feminist theory with outcomes, overall, that were rewarding both to us and to students. We understood that feminist pedagogy is teaching that engages students in political discussion of gender justice (Fisher 44) and that the feminist teacher can be a potent agent of (Culley 211). However, we also understood that a change in consciousness was a precursor to a social change toward greater equality; thus, we wanted to raise student consciousness about feminism so that social change would be more likely. To his end we encouraged feminist analyses that critiqued how features of identity (gender, race, class, age, ability, and sexual preference) affect life experiences. Hence, our ultimate goal was to bring about changes not only in consciousness but also in practice at micro level of social relationships. This goal necessitated our efforts to have students recognize and interrogate their resistance to feminist ideas, a reflective exercise with which students struggled, but also ultimately enjoyed. Throughout course, we also reflected on and analyzed our own struggles in this process. Considerable research has been done on resistance to, or ambiguity around, identification with feminism or a feminist identity (Volman and Ten Dam; Budgeon; Bulbeck; Titus). Some re earch has taken place within educational settings, where feminist theorizing is guiding perspective of course. A central theme in literature is that, regardless of feminist teachers' efforts to have students appreciate how social structures perpetuate inequality and relate to their own lives, for most students oppressive structures of society remain vague. Although they acknowledge feminist goals of equality, students also seem to have little or no interest in examining barriers to achieving that equality even after they have been exposed to feminist analyses of structural
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,015 | 0,024 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,025 | 0,057 |
| Communication savante | 0,015 | 0,013 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,014 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,008 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».