MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W197759016

Critical Pedagogy and Personal Struggles: Feminist Scholarship outside Women's Studies.

2005· article· en· W197759016 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Debra Langan, Deborah Davidson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender Roles and Identity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeminismScholarshipSociologyFeminist pedagogyGender studiesFeminist philosophyConsciousness raisingFeminist theoryPoliticsWomen's studiesIdentity (music)PedagogyPolitical scienceAesthetics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article was inspired by our attempts to impact student responses to feminist theorizing in a third-year social psychology course. It was grounded in our participant observation, over a three-year period, as instructors at York University in Toronto, Canada. In our respective roles as professor and tutorial assistant, we, Debra and Deborah, enjoyed a friendly, collegial relationship that was characterized by a collaborative approach to and research. In our experience in a university setting1 we had seen how infiltration of feminist ideas into nonfeminist courses was met with hostility from many students.2 We wanted to enhance course experience, not only for disgruntled students, but also for ourselves. As noted by Robert Menzies and Dorothy E. Chunn, The lecture podium can be a lonely place at best of times, and anti-feminist resistance can be devastating (68). During three years we describe here, we implemented a number of pedagogical techniques to facilitate and learning of feminist theory with outcomes, overall, that were rewarding both to us and to students. We understood that feminist pedagogy is teaching that engages students in political discussion of gender justice (Fisher 44) and that the feminist teacher can be a potent agent of (Culley 211). However, we also understood that a change in consciousness was a precursor to a social change toward greater equality; thus, we wanted to raise student consciousness about feminism so that social change would be more likely. To his end we encouraged feminist analyses that critiqued how features of identity (gender, race, class, age, ability, and sexual preference) affect life experiences. Hence, our ultimate goal was to bring about changes not only in consciousness but also in practice at micro level of social relationships. This goal necessitated our efforts to have students recognize and interrogate their resistance to feminist ideas, a reflective exercise with which students struggled, but also ultimately enjoyed. Throughout course, we also reflected on and analyzed our own struggles in this process. Considerable research has been done on resistance to, or ambiguity around, identification with feminism or a feminist identity (Volman and Ten Dam; Budgeon; Bulbeck; Titus). Some re earch has taken place within educational settings, where feminist theorizing is guiding perspective of course. A central theme in literature is that, regardless of feminist teachers' efforts to have students appreciate how social structures perpetuate inequality and relate to their own lives, for most students oppressive structures of society remain vague. Although they acknowledge feminist goals of equality, students also seem to have little or no interest in examining barriers to achieving that equality even after they have been exposed to feminist analyses of structural

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.209
Threshold uncertainty score0.848

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGender Roles and Identity StudiesFrench-language works237,207