MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1978252703 · doi:10.1353/jmh.2004.0114

An Ocean in Common: American Naval Officers, Scientists, and the Ocean Environment (review)

2004· article· en· W1978252703 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gordon E. Hogg

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Journal of Military History · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueMaritime and Coastal Archaeology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNavyHistoryOceanographyOperations researchEngineeringArchaeologyGeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: An Ocean in Common: American Naval Officers, Scientists, and the Ocean Environment Gordon E. Hogg An Ocean in Common: American Naval Officers, Scientists, and the Ocean Environment. By Gary E. Weir. College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 2001. ISBN 1-58544-114-7. Photographs. Notes. Bibliography. Index. Pp. xix, 403. $44.95. Though late in joining the train of critical recognition accorded Gary E. Weir's An Ocean in Common, this "caboose" review is nonetheless dedicated to adding its perspective on this estimable publication. A book that can attract signal attention and praise from critics in several intersecting fields (among them naval history, naval research and development, oceanography, and the environmental and marine sciences) is rare indeed, and the welcome bellwether of a kind of "writing across the curriculum" ecumenism worthy of imitation and encouragement in the maritime research community. Following Dr. Weir's own description of his research and publishing path from his Building American Submarines, 1914-1940 (Washington: Naval Historical Center, 1991) and Building the Kaiser's Navy (Annapolis, Md: Naval Institute Press, 1992), through Forged in War: the Naval-Industrial Complex and American Submarine Construction, 1940-1960 (Washington: Naval Historical Center, 1993), and into the broad reaches of An Ocean in Common, one is struck by the evolution of the author's focus from detailed and synthesized assaying of the processes whereby increasingly complex oceangoing (and ocean-penetrating!) vessels came to be conceived and created over less than a century, right up to his "Aha!" decision to take as his latest subject certain convergent approaches to the very globe-girdling medium his previous inspirations had made their milieu, the ocean. The reader who is up to the challenge of this very intelligently written book will find the author's ingenious format a helpful foil to the sometimes daunting waves of analysis, explication, and information his excellent prose and notes set forth. In interposing his two perspective-lending "Interpolations" at key junctures among the eighteen chapters, Dr. Weir enjoins the interested reader to review and contextualize naval-scientific struggles and developments from the World War I era to the outbreak of World War II (after the first five chapters), and then (after Chapter Ten) to consider how collaborations during that second great conflict further solidified the connections between the U.S. Navy and the scientific community, setting the stage [End Page 1011] for the last eight chapters' elucidation of key oceanographic developments shared by these increasingly close partners in the early years of the Cold War. The well-chosen photographs following each Interpolation bring the reader closer to the important players, institutions, and events portrayed in An Ocean in Common, pointing up the intricate human relations that defined and cut across the scientific accomplishments of the communities involved. While limiting his work to the rich possibilities that a focused study of the American experience in this wide arena afforded him, Dr. Weir does particularly note the valuable contributions of Canada in this convergence, a full accounting of which he believes would merit another book. Indeed, developments beyond 1961 necessarily also fall outside the comprehensive purview of An Ocean in Common, a situation that should inspire a continuation of this valuable line of inquiry: the era of a deepening Cold War and beyond brought about further notable scientific and naval collaborations such as the employment of purpose-built submersibles—with the help of advanced sonar technology—in finding and documenting sunken civil and military ships once thought irretrievably lost, or the exhaustive mapping of the world oceans for the Soviet Navy's multi-volume Atlas Okeanov (Atlas of the oceans; Leningrad: Ministry of Defense, 1974-1980). For those writers who are game, the expanding study of the world's oceans is their research oyster, and Gary Weir, for one, has cultured a true pearl. Gordon E. Hogg University of Kentucky Libraries Lexington, Kentucky Copyright © 2004 Society for Military History

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,477
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,004
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,194
Écart entre enseignants0,184 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Journal of Military HistoryMême sujetMaritime and Coastal ArchaeologyTravaux en français237 207