MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978252703 · doi:10.1353/jmh.2004.0114

An Ocean in Common: American Naval Officers, Scientists, and the Ocean Environment (review)

2004· article· en· W1978252703 on OpenAlex
Gordon E. Hogg

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Military History · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMaritime and Coastal Archaeology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNavyHistoryOceanographyOperations researchEngineeringArchaeologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: An Ocean in Common: American Naval Officers, Scientists, and the Ocean Environment Gordon E. Hogg An Ocean in Common: American Naval Officers, Scientists, and the Ocean Environment. By Gary E. Weir. College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 2001. ISBN 1-58544-114-7. Photographs. Notes. Bibliography. Index. Pp. xix, 403. $44.95. Though late in joining the train of critical recognition accorded Gary E. Weir's An Ocean in Common, this "caboose" review is nonetheless dedicated to adding its perspective on this estimable publication. A book that can attract signal attention and praise from critics in several intersecting fields (among them naval history, naval research and development, oceanography, and the environmental and marine sciences) is rare indeed, and the welcome bellwether of a kind of "writing across the curriculum" ecumenism worthy of imitation and encouragement in the maritime research community. Following Dr. Weir's own description of his research and publishing path from his Building American Submarines, 1914-1940 (Washington: Naval Historical Center, 1991) and Building the Kaiser's Navy (Annapolis, Md: Naval Institute Press, 1992), through Forged in War: the Naval-Industrial Complex and American Submarine Construction, 1940-1960 (Washington: Naval Historical Center, 1993), and into the broad reaches of An Ocean in Common, one is struck by the evolution of the author's focus from detailed and synthesized assaying of the processes whereby increasingly complex oceangoing (and ocean-penetrating!) vessels came to be conceived and created over less than a century, right up to his "Aha!" decision to take as his latest subject certain convergent approaches to the very globe-girdling medium his previous inspirations had made their milieu, the ocean. The reader who is up to the challenge of this very intelligently written book will find the author's ingenious format a helpful foil to the sometimes daunting waves of analysis, explication, and information his excellent prose and notes set forth. In interposing his two perspective-lending "Interpolations" at key junctures among the eighteen chapters, Dr. Weir enjoins the interested reader to review and contextualize naval-scientific struggles and developments from the World War I era to the outbreak of World War II (after the first five chapters), and then (after Chapter Ten) to consider how collaborations during that second great conflict further solidified the connections between the U.S. Navy and the scientific community, setting the stage [End Page 1011] for the last eight chapters' elucidation of key oceanographic developments shared by these increasingly close partners in the early years of the Cold War. The well-chosen photographs following each Interpolation bring the reader closer to the important players, institutions, and events portrayed in An Ocean in Common, pointing up the intricate human relations that defined and cut across the scientific accomplishments of the communities involved. While limiting his work to the rich possibilities that a focused study of the American experience in this wide arena afforded him, Dr. Weir does particularly note the valuable contributions of Canada in this convergence, a full accounting of which he believes would merit another book. Indeed, developments beyond 1961 necessarily also fall outside the comprehensive purview of An Ocean in Common, a situation that should inspire a continuation of this valuable line of inquiry: the era of a deepening Cold War and beyond brought about further notable scientific and naval collaborations such as the employment of purpose-built submersibles—with the help of advanced sonar technology—in finding and documenting sunken civil and military ships once thought irretrievably lost, or the exhaustive mapping of the world oceans for the Soviet Navy's multi-volume Atlas Okeanov (Atlas of the oceans; Leningrad: Ministry of Defense, 1974-1980). For those writers who are game, the expanding study of the world's oceans is their research oyster, and Gary Weir, for one, has cultured a true pearl. Gordon E. Hogg University of Kentucky Libraries Lexington, Kentucky Copyright © 2004 Society for Military History

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.477
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it