Nuclear oncology in Cancer Imaging 2011
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Nuclear oncology featured strongly in the 2011 issue of Cancer Imaging with 5 reviews, 2 original articles and 3 case reports. Many articles described diagnostic applications of novel or emerging tracers. Stomatostatin receptor scintigraphy provided the focus of 2 original articles and a case report. Jindal et al.[1] (New Delhi, India) evaluated of the role of [18F]FDG-PET/CT and [68Ga]DOTATOC-PET/CT in 20 patients with pulmonary carcinoids and concluded that the different uptake patterns of the 2 tracers and the ratio of measured uptake may be helpful in differentiating between typical and atypical carcinoids. A case report of concomitant lung and gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours by Kaemmerer et al.[2] (Bad Berka, Germany) highlighted the utility of gallium-68 somatostatin receptor PET/CT based detection and follow-up of neuroendocrine tumours. A study by Beauregard et al.[3] (Quebec City, Canada) described the development of a quantitative 177Lu SPECT imaging method using a commercially available SPECT/CT system. The authors highlighted the potential for the technique to yield more accurate dosimetry estimates and facilitate therapeutic response assessment for therapeutic agents such [177Lu]octreotate. A case report by Holter et al.[4] (Oklahoma City, USA) illustrates the utility of [18F]fluorothymidine-PET imaging in the diagnosis of leptomeningeal involvement with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Tracers such as [18F]fluorthymidine that depict proliferation, as well as hypoxia markers such as 18F-labelled fluorinated imidazoles, are also highlighted by ICIS fellow Wim Oyen (Nijmegen, The Netherlands) in his review of the prospects for molecular imaging in the Special Issue in which he explores the role of PET beyond FDG for patient selection, treatment modification and adaptation and early response monitoring following radiotherapy[5]. The use of the more widely used PET tracer [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose is considered in 3 articles related to thoracic malignancies. Kaira et al.[6] (Shizuoka, Japan) systematically reviewed the role of [18F]FDG-PET in thymic epithelial tumours and concluded that [18F]FDG-PET may be useful in differentiating thymomas and thymic carcinomas. A case report by Akosman et al.[7] (Istanbul, Turkey) entitled Unicentric mixed variant Castleman disease associated with Hashimoto disease: the role of PET/CT in staging and evaluating response to the treatment proposes a potential role for [18F]FDG-PET/CT not only in staging Castleman disease but also in the assessment of treatment response. In the Special Issue, ICIS fellow Sheila Rankin (London, UK) reviews the value of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in oesophageal cancer highlighting the technique’s accepted role as an adjunct to conventional imaging for the staging of oesophageal cancer, for response assessment and identification of recurrent disease[8]. An issue that potentially affects imaging with any PET tracer is the clinical significance and management of lesion motion due to respiration during PET/CT scanning, which was reviewed by Callahan et al.[9] (Melbourne, Australia). They illustrate how accurate characterization of PET-avid disease in areas of high respiratory motion can be challenging and describe different approaches that have been used to address the issue of respiratory motion in PET/CT. The continuing development of conventional gamma imaging in oncology is shown by Dizdarevic and Peters[10] (Brighton, UK) who review the imaging of multidrug resistance in cancer with an emphasis on [99mTc]MIBI scintigraphy, illustrating the opportunities for cost-effectively guiding individualized treatment in an era of personalized medicine. These Cancer Imaging articles testify to the ongoing importance of nuclear medicine in the imaging and treatment of cancer.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle