MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1980521785 · doi:10.2319/0003-3219-83.2.364

It's a small world…after all

2013· editorial· en· W1980521785 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Steven J. Lindauer

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Angle Orthodontist · 2013
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueDental Education, Practice, Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésReading (process)The InternetSimplicityProcess (computing)Computer scienceWorld Wide WebPolitical scienceLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Twenty-five years from now, in 2038, I hope someone reads this in the Angle archives and laughs at the simplicity of my thoughts. Many of you may already be smiling because you can foresee changes coming better than I. It takes special talent to predict the future; I don't think I have that talent. So, rather than looking ahead, I am going to marvel about where we are, The Angle Orthodontist, and how we got here.Only 25 years ago, the internet had not quite begun to have an impact on the average person's life. In 1988, the process of communicating by transferring information over computer networks was cumbersome, if not just about impossible for most of us. The majority at that time did not even have access to a computer. When I graduated from my orthodontic residency in 1989, I felt particularly fortunate that I was able to use a university computer to produce my thesis, thus avoiding having to hire a typist to make the final copy. Yet, in that same year, David Turpin envisioned a future (female) Editor of The Angle Orthodontist in 2010, reading the daily news online at home before coming to work.1 From her office, she would transmit manuscripts electronically to reviewers and post final versions of articles (3 weeks to 3 months later) on a computer network where they would be available instantaneously to readers across the country. Looking back, you have to admit this was pretty insightful for 1989. However, there was an exciting piece of reality still missing.At the time that Turpin was predicting quite accurately an electronic transformation for The Angle Orthodontist, the journal was distributed in printed form only, and primarily in the US and Canada. Submitting manuscripts and even sending paper copies of the journal through the mail took longer and cost more from other countries. In 1991, almost 70% of the papers published in The Angle Orthodontist (and the AJODO) originated in North America. Compare that with 2011, 20 years later, when greater than 70% of the published papers (69% for the AJODO) were authored in countries other than the US or Canada. Of course, this transition happened progressively during the intervening time and was certainly nurtured and encouraged under the watchful eye of Bob Isaacson2; I was just the fortunate benefactor.The absolutely astounding statistics come from examining who reads The Angle Orthodontist online. While printed copies of the journal are still primarily distributed in the US and Canada, the Angle website is visited by more than 25,000 unique viewers in a month's time and only 14% of them are in the US!3 The remaining readers are in 147 other countries throughout the world, the largest share of which are in India, Brazil, China, Mexico, the United Kingdom, Turkey, Spain, Italy, and Peru, in that order. By contrast, the United Nations has 193 Member States. It is quite remarkable that we consider it routine to be able to access this valuable resource from anywhere…at any time…and without cost!For me, receiving articles submitted from authors in 60 countries each year and recruiting reviewers from all over the world means that I routinely communicate with orthodontists and researchers all around the globe. It's a dream that I never would have imagined 25 years ago. Having enjoyed traveling to what I considered “far-off places”, first in my imagination by studying maps, and then in books, online, and finally to some extent in “real life”, it is extraordinary that I now have friends that live and work in those areas, some of whom I have never actually met face to face. Flipping on my computer and saying hello to colleagues across North and South America, in Europe, Africa, Asia, or Australia, happens nearly every day.In his 3 part series portraying the life of Edward Angle, Sheldon Peck made special reference to the 1904 World's Fair of St. Louis, and the accompanying Fourth International Dental Congress, which helped thrust Edward Angle and orthodontics into “a global spotlight”.4 Throughout his career, Angle's classes included students from other countries and he maintained contact with friends and correspondents from South Africa, Japan…far reaches of the globe. One can only imagine that the world must have seemed much bigger then. One can only imagine where we will be in another 25, 50, or 100 years.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,367
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0130,029

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,093
Tête enseignante GPT0,477
Écart entre enseignants0,384 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Angle OrthodontistMême sujetDental Education, Practice, ResearchTravaux en français237 207