MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980521785 · doi:10.2319/0003-3219-83.2.364

It's a small world…after all

2013· editorial· en· W1980521785 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Steven J. Lindauer

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Angle Orthodontist · 2013
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDental Education, Practice, Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReading (process)The InternetSimplicityProcess (computing)Computer scienceWorld Wide WebPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Twenty-five years from now, in 2038, I hope someone reads this in the Angle archives and laughs at the simplicity of my thoughts. Many of you may already be smiling because you can foresee changes coming better than I. It takes special talent to predict the future; I don't think I have that talent. So, rather than looking ahead, I am going to marvel about where we are, The Angle Orthodontist, and how we got here.Only 25 years ago, the internet had not quite begun to have an impact on the average person's life. In 1988, the process of communicating by transferring information over computer networks was cumbersome, if not just about impossible for most of us. The majority at that time did not even have access to a computer. When I graduated from my orthodontic residency in 1989, I felt particularly fortunate that I was able to use a university computer to produce my thesis, thus avoiding having to hire a typist to make the final copy. Yet, in that same year, David Turpin envisioned a future (female) Editor of The Angle Orthodontist in 2010, reading the daily news online at home before coming to work.1 From her office, she would transmit manuscripts electronically to reviewers and post final versions of articles (3 weeks to 3 months later) on a computer network where they would be available instantaneously to readers across the country. Looking back, you have to admit this was pretty insightful for 1989. However, there was an exciting piece of reality still missing.At the time that Turpin was predicting quite accurately an electronic transformation for The Angle Orthodontist, the journal was distributed in printed form only, and primarily in the US and Canada. Submitting manuscripts and even sending paper copies of the journal through the mail took longer and cost more from other countries. In 1991, almost 70% of the papers published in The Angle Orthodontist (and the AJODO) originated in North America. Compare that with 2011, 20 years later, when greater than 70% of the published papers (69% for the AJODO) were authored in countries other than the US or Canada. Of course, this transition happened progressively during the intervening time and was certainly nurtured and encouraged under the watchful eye of Bob Isaacson2; I was just the fortunate benefactor.The absolutely astounding statistics come from examining who reads The Angle Orthodontist online. While printed copies of the journal are still primarily distributed in the US and Canada, the Angle website is visited by more than 25,000 unique viewers in a month's time and only 14% of them are in the US!3 The remaining readers are in 147 other countries throughout the world, the largest share of which are in India, Brazil, China, Mexico, the United Kingdom, Turkey, Spain, Italy, and Peru, in that order. By contrast, the United Nations has 193 Member States. It is quite remarkable that we consider it routine to be able to access this valuable resource from anywhere…at any time…and without cost!For me, receiving articles submitted from authors in 60 countries each year and recruiting reviewers from all over the world means that I routinely communicate with orthodontists and researchers all around the globe. It's a dream that I never would have imagined 25 years ago. Having enjoyed traveling to what I considered “far-off places”, first in my imagination by studying maps, and then in books, online, and finally to some extent in “real life”, it is extraordinary that I now have friends that live and work in those areas, some of whom I have never actually met face to face. Flipping on my computer and saying hello to colleagues across North and South America, in Europe, Africa, Asia, or Australia, happens nearly every day.In his 3 part series portraying the life of Edward Angle, Sheldon Peck made special reference to the 1904 World's Fair of St. Louis, and the accompanying Fourth International Dental Congress, which helped thrust Edward Angle and orthodontics into “a global spotlight”.4 Throughout his career, Angle's classes included students from other countries and he maintained contact with friends and correspondents from South Africa, Japan…far reaches of the globe. One can only imagine that the world must have seemed much bigger then. One can only imagine where we will be in another 25, 50, or 100 years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.367
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.029

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.477
Teacher spread0.384 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Angle OrthodontistSame topicDental Education, Practice, ResearchFrench-language works237,207