MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1981496467 · doi:10.1071/rdv18n2ab224

224 OVARIAN FOLLICLE DEVELOPMENT DURING SEASONAL TRANSITION IN WAPITI

2005· article· en· W1981496467 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert McCorkell, Murray R. Woodbury, Gregor B. Adams

Notice bibliographique

RevueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEstrous cycleOvulationFollicular phaseSeasonal breederAnimal scienceBiologyLuteal phaseInternal medicineEndocrinologyMedicineEcologyHormone

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Wapiti are seasonally polyestrous. The transition into and out of the breeding season is marked by resumption of ovulation in autumn and cessation of ovulation in winter. Onset of ovulatory cyclicity is distinct and associated with aggressive breeding behavior of stags in rut. Cessation of ovulation at the end of the breeding season is not distinguished by behavioral patterns. The objective of the present study was to characterize follicular and luteal dynamics in wapiti during the transitional periods into and out of the breeding seasons. Transition from anestrus to estrus was monitored in 15 hinds, aged 2 to 14 years, over two successive seasons (11 in year 1, with 5 hinds from year 1 used again in year 2 along with 4 new hinds; n = 20 observations). Transition from estrus to anestrus was monitored in 11 hinds over 1 season ( n = 11 observations). Hinds were maintained on a farm near Saskatoon, Saskatchewan (52°07'N, 106°38'W). The ovaries were examined daily during September through October by transrectral ultrasonography using a B-mode ultrasound machine and a 7.5 MHz linear array transducer for transition to estrus, and December through April for transition to anestrus. The first ovulation was recorded on September 15 and all hinds had ovulated for the first time by October 7. In 17 of 20 observations, the duration of the first interovulatory interval (IOI) was 9.3 ± 0.4 days (mean ± SEM). With one exception, these IOIs were characterized by one wave of follicular development. The remaining three IOIs ranged from 16 to 23 days and consisted of two or three waves of follicle development. The second ovulation occurred by October 15 in hinds with a short IOI and by October 17 in all remaining hinds. The mean dates of first and last ovulation were September 25 and February 7, respectively, an interval of 135 days. The median date of the last ovulation was February 15 and the range was from December 3 to March 22. Duration of the last IOI of the season (21.2 ± 0.6 days) was similar to the notional 21-day cycle for wapiti, but longer ( P < 0.05) than the duration of the first IOI (10.9 ± 1.0 days). Maximum diameters of the first 2 ovulatory follicles were similar (11.3 ± 0.4 vs. 11.3 ± 0.2 mm), but were larger ( P < 0.05) than the last 2 ovulatory follicles of the breeding season (10.3 ± 0.3 vs. 10.1 ± 0.4 mm). Maximum diameter of the corpus luteum (CL) tended ( P = 0.06) to be smaller for the short IOI than for longer IOI of the first and last cycles. Diameter of the last CL of the season was not different from that of the previous CL (12.8 ± 0.6 vs. 12.5 ± 0.6 mm); however, it was detected for a longer period (22.3 ± 1.2 vs. 19.3 ± 0.7 days; P < 0.05). Estrous cycles during transition into the breeding season have been described as being irregular and those out of the breeding season as increasingly long. In the present study, the transition periods were characterized by regular events. Transition to regular estrous cycles was preceded by one short (9 days) IOI. The last IOI of the breeding season was the same as that reported during the rut. Transition to anestrus occurred most commonly in February and was marked by a failure of the dominant follicle to ovulate after luteal regression.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,729
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,561

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,222
Écart entre enseignants0,210 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentMême sujetGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockTravaux en français237 207