MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981496467 · doi:10.1071/rdv18n2ab224

224 OVARIAN FOLLICLE DEVELOPMENT DURING SEASONAL TRANSITION IN WAPITI

2005· article· en· W1981496467 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert McCorkell, Murray R. Woodbury, Gregor B. Adams

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstrous cycleOvulationFollicular phaseSeasonal breederAnimal scienceBiologyLuteal phaseInternal medicineEndocrinologyMedicineEcologyHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wapiti are seasonally polyestrous. The transition into and out of the breeding season is marked by resumption of ovulation in autumn and cessation of ovulation in winter. Onset of ovulatory cyclicity is distinct and associated with aggressive breeding behavior of stags in rut. Cessation of ovulation at the end of the breeding season is not distinguished by behavioral patterns. The objective of the present study was to characterize follicular and luteal dynamics in wapiti during the transitional periods into and out of the breeding seasons. Transition from anestrus to estrus was monitored in 15 hinds, aged 2 to 14 years, over two successive seasons (11 in year 1, with 5 hinds from year 1 used again in year 2 along with 4 new hinds; n = 20 observations). Transition from estrus to anestrus was monitored in 11 hinds over 1 season ( n = 11 observations). Hinds were maintained on a farm near Saskatoon, Saskatchewan (52°07'N, 106°38'W). The ovaries were examined daily during September through October by transrectral ultrasonography using a B-mode ultrasound machine and a 7.5 MHz linear array transducer for transition to estrus, and December through April for transition to anestrus. The first ovulation was recorded on September 15 and all hinds had ovulated for the first time by October 7. In 17 of 20 observations, the duration of the first interovulatory interval (IOI) was 9.3 ± 0.4 days (mean ± SEM). With one exception, these IOIs were characterized by one wave of follicular development. The remaining three IOIs ranged from 16 to 23 days and consisted of two or three waves of follicle development. The second ovulation occurred by October 15 in hinds with a short IOI and by October 17 in all remaining hinds. The mean dates of first and last ovulation were September 25 and February 7, respectively, an interval of 135 days. The median date of the last ovulation was February 15 and the range was from December 3 to March 22. Duration of the last IOI of the season (21.2 ± 0.6 days) was similar to the notional 21-day cycle for wapiti, but longer ( P < 0.05) than the duration of the first IOI (10.9 ± 1.0 days). Maximum diameters of the first 2 ovulatory follicles were similar (11.3 ± 0.4 vs. 11.3 ± 0.2 mm), but were larger ( P < 0.05) than the last 2 ovulatory follicles of the breeding season (10.3 ± 0.3 vs. 10.1 ± 0.4 mm). Maximum diameter of the corpus luteum (CL) tended ( P = 0.06) to be smaller for the short IOI than for longer IOI of the first and last cycles. Diameter of the last CL of the season was not different from that of the previous CL (12.8 ± 0.6 vs. 12.5 ± 0.6 mm); however, it was detected for a longer period (22.3 ± 1.2 vs. 19.3 ± 0.7 days; P < 0.05). Estrous cycles during transition into the breeding season have been described as being irregular and those out of the breeding season as increasingly long. In the present study, the transition periods were characterized by regular events. Transition to regular estrous cycles was preceded by one short (9 days) IOI. The last IOI of the breeding season was the same as that reported during the rut. Transition to anestrus occurred most commonly in February and was marked by a failure of the dominant follicle to ovulate after luteal regression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.729
Threshold uncertainty score0.561

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockFrench-language works237,207