MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1981721537 · doi:10.1353/nin.2005.0034

The American Game: Baseball and Ethnicity (review)

2005· article· en· W1981721537 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Robert K. Barney, David E Barney

Notice bibliographique

RevueNine · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican Sports and Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEthnic groupLeagueHistoryMedia studiesSociologyAnthropology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The American Game: Baseball and Ethnicity Robert K. Barney (bio) and David E. Barney (bio) Lawrence Baldassaro and Richard Johnson, eds. The American Game: Baseball and Ethnicity. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2002. 215 pp. Cloth, $50.00; paper, $18.00. In the recently concluded American League Pennant Championships and consequent World Series, which sent Red Sox Nation citizens into rhapsody and exultation, it was apparent that much of the core strength of each team involved, including, of course, the Bosox, capitalized greatly on the skills and brilliance of those individuals that might be termed ethnic individuals. There can be little argument that baseball's modern times demonstrate a demographic that illustrates, and indeed underscores, that players from across the world are now part and parcel of the contemporary Major League baseball scene. In a relatively new book, The American Game: Baseball and Ethnicity, the result of these unfolding evolutionary circumstances is placed front and center for our examination. In The American Game professor Lawrence Baldassaro and sports curator Richard Johnson bring us a collection of nine essays about baseball and ethnicity—or are they really essays about ethnicity and baseball? The stitching is so closely entwined that it is difficult to tell which thread overlaps the other. In fairness to the editors they leave the answer to that question, if indeed it is a valid one, to the reader. Either way, the essays, taken as a single body of work, leave little doubt about the importance of ethnic presence and personality and its signature on America's national pastime. Baseball is an American game, born and bred, and as such it personifies, perhaps more than any other game in American culture, the content of American history and heritage as well as demographic ethnicity. Aficionados of baseball history are familiar with the often-quoted dictum [End Page 155] of Jacques Barzun, noted American social commentator, who many years ago claimed that "if one wanted to know America, they had better know baseball," or words to the same effect. The same dictum, with a twist, might be applied to the literally millions and millions of immigrants who came to America well before the time of Barzun's proclamation. The "twist" might read: "If you want to assimilate in America, play baseball." And so they did—Germans, Irish, Italians, Jews, Slavs, Latin Americans and, finally, Asians.1 Add to this mix the African American baseball experience, one that progressed from the late nineteenth century until almost the mid–twentieth century in segregated perspective and then finally in integration with post–World War II Major League America. This "twist" is not mere theory; it is fact. It is not, we think, a simply romanticized vision of circumstances. After all, we observed it firsthand as lived by "ethnic types" with, and against, whom we competed during our own boyhood over half a century ago. To this point we shall return at the end of this review. To examine baseball history is to follow a systematic trail of development, prominence, and in some cases even dominance, all laid down in neat chronological order by specific groups of Americans. First in this saga, of course, are English folks. After all, bat-and-ball games arrived in the cultural baggage of children who, with their parents, helped to colonize the Massachusetts Bay Colony in 1620.2 Over the years the game was modified to suit young adults. It followed, therefore, that most of the participants and critical developmental personalities in American baseball history, both before and immediately after the evolution of the professional game in the middle 1870s, were people with English ethnic names, including such important personalities as Cartwright, Chadwick, Spaulding, Adams, and Montgomery Ward. In The American Game this aspect is addressed in an important essay entitled "The Many Fathers of Baseball," written by Frederick Ivor-Campbell, an American of Scots heritage who has twice served as vice president of that huge but august body of people who study baseball the most intently, the Society of American Baseball Research (SABR). Ivor-Campbell's essay traces the tale of the game's origin and evolution toward modernity as well as the people who made...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,024
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,081

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,006
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0240,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,240
Écart entre enseignants0,228 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNineMême sujetAmerican Sports and LiteratureTravaux en français237 207