MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981721537 · doi:10.1353/nin.2005.0034

The American Game: Baseball and Ethnicity (review)

2005· article· en· W1981721537 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Robert K. Barney, David E Barney

Bibliographic record

VenueNine · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Sports and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthnic groupLeagueHistoryMedia studiesSociologyAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The American Game: Baseball and Ethnicity Robert K. Barney (bio) and David E. Barney (bio) Lawrence Baldassaro and Richard Johnson, eds. The American Game: Baseball and Ethnicity. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2002. 215 pp. Cloth, $50.00; paper, $18.00. In the recently concluded American League Pennant Championships and consequent World Series, which sent Red Sox Nation citizens into rhapsody and exultation, it was apparent that much of the core strength of each team involved, including, of course, the Bosox, capitalized greatly on the skills and brilliance of those individuals that might be termed ethnic individuals. There can be little argument that baseball's modern times demonstrate a demographic that illustrates, and indeed underscores, that players from across the world are now part and parcel of the contemporary Major League baseball scene. In a relatively new book, The American Game: Baseball and Ethnicity, the result of these unfolding evolutionary circumstances is placed front and center for our examination. In The American Game professor Lawrence Baldassaro and sports curator Richard Johnson bring us a collection of nine essays about baseball and ethnicity—or are they really essays about ethnicity and baseball? The stitching is so closely entwined that it is difficult to tell which thread overlaps the other. In fairness to the editors they leave the answer to that question, if indeed it is a valid one, to the reader. Either way, the essays, taken as a single body of work, leave little doubt about the importance of ethnic presence and personality and its signature on America's national pastime. Baseball is an American game, born and bred, and as such it personifies, perhaps more than any other game in American culture, the content of American history and heritage as well as demographic ethnicity. Aficionados of baseball history are familiar with the often-quoted dictum [End Page 155] of Jacques Barzun, noted American social commentator, who many years ago claimed that "if one wanted to know America, they had better know baseball," or words to the same effect. The same dictum, with a twist, might be applied to the literally millions and millions of immigrants who came to America well before the time of Barzun's proclamation. The "twist" might read: "If you want to assimilate in America, play baseball." And so they did—Germans, Irish, Italians, Jews, Slavs, Latin Americans and, finally, Asians.1 Add to this mix the African American baseball experience, one that progressed from the late nineteenth century until almost the mid–twentieth century in segregated perspective and then finally in integration with post–World War II Major League America. This "twist" is not mere theory; it is fact. It is not, we think, a simply romanticized vision of circumstances. After all, we observed it firsthand as lived by "ethnic types" with, and against, whom we competed during our own boyhood over half a century ago. To this point we shall return at the end of this review. To examine baseball history is to follow a systematic trail of development, prominence, and in some cases even dominance, all laid down in neat chronological order by specific groups of Americans. First in this saga, of course, are English folks. After all, bat-and-ball games arrived in the cultural baggage of children who, with their parents, helped to colonize the Massachusetts Bay Colony in 1620.2 Over the years the game was modified to suit young adults. It followed, therefore, that most of the participants and critical developmental personalities in American baseball history, both before and immediately after the evolution of the professional game in the middle 1870s, were people with English ethnic names, including such important personalities as Cartwright, Chadwick, Spaulding, Adams, and Montgomery Ward. In The American Game this aspect is addressed in an important essay entitled "The Many Fathers of Baseball," written by Frederick Ivor-Campbell, an American of Scots heritage who has twice served as vice president of that huge but august body of people who study baseball the most intently, the Society of American Baseball Research (SABR). Ivor-Campbell's essay traces the tale of the game's origin and evolution toward modernity as well as the people who made...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNineSame topicAmerican Sports and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207