MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1982933143 · doi:10.1159/000286749

Cultural Aspects of Psychotherapy

2010· article· en· W1982933143 sur OpenAlexaff
E.D. Wittkower, H. Warms

Notice bibliographique

RevuePsychotherapy and Psychosomatics · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueCultural Differences and Values
Établissements canadiensMcGill UniversityRoyal Victoria Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPsychotherapistPsychologyPsychoanalysis

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This paper deals with the relevance of cultural factors to the application of psychotherapy. It is divided into two parts: cultural psychotherapy and crosscultural psychotherapy. Cultural psychotherapy. Despite certain universal features, marked differences as regards intensity, quality and depth, exist in the forms of psychotherapy practised. Preferences in their choice crossculturally depend on differences in etiological views and on cultural and ideological differences. In many non-industrialized areas of the world, the belief prevails that mental illness is due to supernatural and preternatural forces, e.g. to angry deities, witchcraft or sorcery. In those countries shamans, priests and witchdoctors, in the accepted view, are much better qualified to deal with mental illness than scientifically trained doctors. The procedures which these healers adopt are partly of a physical and partly of a psychological nature. Factors of potential psychotherapeutic value inherent in their procedures include: naming of the supposed supernatural agent, suggestion reinforced by the high prestige of the native healers, projection of internal badness on the scapegoat or any other sacrificial animal, displacement of attack by killing an animal in lieu of a person, and penance by sacrifice. Because in many developing countries reliance on group approval predominates over superego pressure, therapeutic procedures are usually carried out in groups. The psychotherapeutic effect of cult ceremonies has been documented. Owing to the emphasis on individualism, rational thinking, scientific idolatry and tolerance of dissent, psychoanalysis found a fertile ground in the United States. It was rejected in authoritarian countries, such as Soviet Russia and Japan. Russian ‘pathogenic psychotherapy’, and German ‘autogenic training’ ignore the unconscious, are ego directed and have a drill quality. In accordance with Marxist theory, work therapy figures prominently among psychotherapeutic measures in the Soviet Union. It is conceivable that the yoga component in autogenic training and the mysticism in Jung’s analytic psychology and in existential psychotherapy appeal to the mystic leanings of Germans. In accordance with the teaching of Zen Buddhism, Morita therapy practised in Japan aims at acceptance of mental suffering rather than at restoration of mental health. Crosscultural psychotherapy. Application of Western psychotherapeutic procedures to non-Western societies gives rise to difficulties. Divergent views expressed on this matter are: (a) that psychotherapeutic methods are universally applicable; (b) that understanding of each individual must be based on assessment of his specific experiences, and (c) that identical nationality and cultural background facilitate the psychotherapeutic process. If mother tongue of patient and psychotherapist differ, finer nuances presented in the patient’s material may be missed by the psychotherapist, misunderstandings may occur and the newly acquired language may be used by the patient for defensive purposes. Difficulties mount still further if the world view of the psychotherapist grossly diverges from that of the patient. Suspicion and distrust of the white intruder in this case may be rife. Consequently, workers in the field dispute the possibility of applying Western type of psychotherapy to non-Western uneducated persons. For a long time, in developing countries, the services of traditional healers in the treatment of the mentally ill will be indispensable. As the world view of the indigenous population undergoes a change towards Westernization, the following interim steps have been suggested: (a) to acquire skills and techniques to overcome the suspicion and distrust of the Western or Western trained psychiatrist; (b) to establish collaboration between psychiatrists and traditional healers; (c) to adapt Western methods to the cultural climate in which they operate; (d) to offer a rationale for the application of folk healing procedures and to integrate them into Western methods, and (e) to hand over increasingly the care of the mentally ill in developing countries to foreign-trained indigenous psychiatrists.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,009
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,038

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,008
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0090,016
Communication savante0,0060,002
Science ouverte0,0010,006
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,053
Tête enseignante GPT0,380
Écart entre enseignants0,327 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations6
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePsychotherapy and PsychosomaticsMême sujetCultural Differences and ValuesTravaux en français237 207