First Report of <i>Plum pox virus</i> on Plum in New York State
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Plum pox, also known as Sharka, is one of the more significant viral diseases of stone fruit trees such as plum, peach, and apricot. It was first reported in Europe in the early 1900s and more recently in Chile in 1992, the United States (Pennsylvania) in 1999, Canada (Ontario and Nova Scotia) in 2000, China in 2001, and Argentina in 2004. Plum pox virus (PPV) was recently detected in two plum (Prunus domestica) trees in an orchard in Niagara County, NY, located within 5 miles from a Canadian plum pox eradication zone. Typical symptoms of chlorotic rings and spots were observed on some of the leaves from these trees. No symptoms were reported prior to the survey collection in July 2006. Survey samples were screened for the presence of PPV by ELISA using the Agdia PPV (Agdia, Elkhart, IN) specific kit that recognizes all strains but C of PPV. Approximately 5% of the survey samples were additionally analyzed by a validated immunocapture reverse transcription (IC-RT)-PCR TaqMan assay in a Cepheid SmartCycler (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA). Both replicates of the two New York plum trees produced a positive ELISA reaction in two consecutive tests. The ELISA-positive samples also produced positive results when subjected to the real-time IC-RT-PCR test. The PPV-positive trees were sampled again and an additional 53 samples were collected from trees in the surrounding area. Suspect trees again tested positive, while all the trees in the surrounding area tested negative. The methods used for confirmation included two ELISA tests (Durviz [Valencia, Spain] DAS indirect monoclonal ELISA and Agdia DAS polyclonal ELISA). Confirmatory real-time IC-RT-PCR was performed using universal 3' nontranslated region (NTR) primers (2,3) in a SYBR Green assay format and a coat protein (CP) primers/probe TaqMan assay (3,4). Further, the New York PPV isolate was identified as PPV D group using a subgroup specific conventional IC-RT-PCR (1). A 1.4-kb sequence fragment from the 3' end of the New York PPV was sequenced (GenBank Accession No. DG 883816). Comparison of the sequence with the database confirmed this isolate as subgroup D and exhibited a high degree of identity with other PPV D accessions (PPV D Teycheney [Accession No. X16415]; Penn4 [Accession No. DQ465243] Cnd 123-1 [Accession No. AY9553267]; and Cnd 3 [Accession No. AY953262]). To our knowledge, this is the first report of PPV in New York. References: (1) T. Candresse et al. Phytopathology. 88:198, 1998. (2) L. Levy et al. J. Virol. Methods. 49:295, 1994. (3) V. Mavrodieva and L. Levy. Acta Hortic. 657:141, 2004. (4) T. Wetzel et al. J.Virol. Methods 33:355, 1991.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».