Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This issue of Acta Radioloica is dedicated to highlighting some recent trends in pediatric imaging. It is, therefore, not surprising that most of the articles in this issue are focused on the use of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Together, these articles emphasize that MR now also plays a major role in imaging many non-neurological conditions in children, such as diseases of the musculoskeletal system and neoplastic diseases of the entire body. This modality has also become well established as a standard in pediatric cardiac evaluation and its current status in pulmonary evaluation is also reviewed. One of the articles also emphasizes the ideal techniques to use in MR imaging in the pediatric age range. In all large radiology departments dedicated to imaging in pediatrics, it is not only MR that has seen the greatest increase in utilization in recent years, but also ultrasound. This is a highly desirable trend, as neither modality utilizes ionizing radiation which should always be avoided, if possible, particularly in young children. This special issue also highlights the use of ultrasound and compares its role, relative to MR, in cardiac imaging and also in the large field of fetal imaging. Unfortunately, not all imaging procedures required in children can be performed without the utilization of ionizing radiation. The increased demand for image-guided procedures in interventional radiology in children requires the frequent use of fluoroscopy which sometimes may require prolonged exposure times. Furthermore, in children CT remains important for the evaluation of the lungs, bones, some cardiac conditions, and also in conjunction with positron emission tomography (PET) scanning. If not used appropriately in the pediatric setting, CT examinations may deliver unnecessarily high radiation doses and one of the important articles in this special issue addresses the need for CT protocols in pediatrics that are designed to optimize CT imaging with the lowest possible acceptable radiation doses. The subspecialty of pediatric imaging has been established for decades and is represented by large international societies for pediatric radiology in the Americas, Europe, Asia, and Australia. Smaller national societies exist in many countries as well. However, in many parts of the world the performance and interpretation of imaging procedures in children is not always done by dedicated pediatric radiologists. The meticulous techniques required in neonates, infants, and young children often differ markedly from those used in adults. Furthermore, the more complex procedures in children often require sedation and anesthesia. It is, therefore, important for special issues such as this one to highlight current trends in the subspecialty of pediatric radiology and to make these available not only to dedicated pediatric radiologists but also to all physicians who are involved in pediatric imaging. This special issue of Acta Radiologica reviews some of the recent trends in pediatric imaging with a group of excellent articles covering several organ systems and modalities.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».