MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1984457654 · doi:10.1063/1.1768681

Maurice Henry Lecorney Pryce

2004· article· en· W1984457654 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Bill Dalby, John W. Sanders, Kenneth R. Stevens

Notice bibliographique

RevuePhysics Today · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueScientific Research and Discoveries
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCommonwealthClassicsHistoryLawPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Maurice Henry Lecorney Pryce was one of the most talented and versatile theoretical physicists of his generation. He died on 24 July 2003 in Vancouver, Canada.Maurice was born in Croydon, England, on 24 January 1914. At the University of Cambridge, he gained a first-class degree in mathematics and started research in 1933 with Ralph Fowler and Nobel Prize winner Max Born. Two years later, he was awarded a prestigious Commonwealth Fund Fellowship to attend Princeton University, where he gained a PhD in 1937. His thesis was on the wave mechanics of the proton. On his return to Cambridge in 1937, he was elected a fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge, and his work on the then popular but erroneous neutrino theory of light came to the attention of Paul Dirac, who persuaded him to publish it. Maurice considered that to be the high point of his career.During World War II, he worked on the development of microwave radar and subsequently on aspects of fission research, although he declined for moral reasons to be engaged directly in the development of the nuclear bomb. In 1945, Maurice returned to his fellowship at Trinity College and, during the next year, accepted the Wykeham Chair of Physics at Oxford University as a specialist in theoretical physics in the Clarendon Laboratory. There, a significant reputation in the low-temperature field had been established before the war, and work in the new field of electron spin resonance was just starting. Both topics were highly appealing to doctoral students, and Maurice, with his background in quantum mechanics and electromagnetism, was the ideal collaborator.Soon Oxford was attracting potential theoreticians as doctoral students, who later moved to elsewhere in the world; among those were John Ward and Anatole Abragam. The laboratory was under the control of the autocratic head of the physics department, Frederick Lindemann (Lord Cherwell), whose ideas on building up a permanent staff did not always coincide with Maurice’s. The result was a sad one for Oxford: In 1954, Maurice filled the vacancy left at Bristol University in England, when Nevill Mott moved from there to Cambridge, and theoretical physics at Oxford suffered as a result.At Bristol, Maurice became head of the physics department and continued to publish in a wide range of fields. After 10 years, he was attracted by, and accepted, an offer from the University of Southern California as distinguished professor of physics and chairman of the physics department. At USC, he became disappointed in the progress he could make in expanding the department and was frustrated with the associated politics, so in 1968 he moved to Canada to take the position of senior professor at the University of British Columbia. For the first time in many years, Maurice was totally free of administrative duties.His most important contribution at UBC was as a helpful critic or collaborator on any problem in any branch of physics. His personal research included electromagnetic properties of pulsars, the quantum mechanics of the hydrogen atom in very large magnetic fields, and many problems in general relativity. Although much of his work was completed, virtually none was published. He had a substantial interest in experimental molecular spectroscopy and multiphoton processes. Maurice would always ask, “What is the experiment?” He wanted to know exactly what was being measured and how. But learning of a well-resolved complex UV spectrum of the hydroxyl molecule that had baffled professionals, he asked to see the data, fully expecting to finish his analysis over a weekend. After 25 years, much work, and many interesting collateral results, this spectrum remained for him a puzzle, and is still unsolved.Maurice remained active in research and consultation, which included the problem of the disposal of radioactive waste, until 1999, when he suffered a stroke that left him effectively a quadriplegic at age 86. After a brief period of severe depression, his acceptance of his condition led to an active intellectual life, which continued until his death.Maurice Henry Lecorney PrycePPT|High resolution© 2004 American Institute of Physics.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,401
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,997

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,273
Écart entre enseignants0,255 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2004
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePhysics TodayMême sujetScientific Research and DiscoveriesTravaux en français237 207