MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984457654 · doi:10.1063/1.1768681

Maurice Henry Lecorney Pryce

2004· article· en· W1984457654 on OpenAlexaffabout
Bill Dalby, John W. Sanders, Kenneth R. Stevens

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics Today · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicScientific Research and Discoveries
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommonwealthClassicsHistoryLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Maurice Henry Lecorney Pryce was one of the most talented and versatile theoretical physicists of his generation. He died on 24 July 2003 in Vancouver, Canada.Maurice was born in Croydon, England, on 24 January 1914. At the University of Cambridge, he gained a first-class degree in mathematics and started research in 1933 with Ralph Fowler and Nobel Prize winner Max Born. Two years later, he was awarded a prestigious Commonwealth Fund Fellowship to attend Princeton University, where he gained a PhD in 1937. His thesis was on the wave mechanics of the proton. On his return to Cambridge in 1937, he was elected a fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge, and his work on the then popular but erroneous neutrino theory of light came to the attention of Paul Dirac, who persuaded him to publish it. Maurice considered that to be the high point of his career.During World War II, he worked on the development of microwave radar and subsequently on aspects of fission research, although he declined for moral reasons to be engaged directly in the development of the nuclear bomb. In 1945, Maurice returned to his fellowship at Trinity College and, during the next year, accepted the Wykeham Chair of Physics at Oxford University as a specialist in theoretical physics in the Clarendon Laboratory. There, a significant reputation in the low-temperature field had been established before the war, and work in the new field of electron spin resonance was just starting. Both topics were highly appealing to doctoral students, and Maurice, with his background in quantum mechanics and electromagnetism, was the ideal collaborator.Soon Oxford was attracting potential theoreticians as doctoral students, who later moved to elsewhere in the world; among those were John Ward and Anatole Abragam. The laboratory was under the control of the autocratic head of the physics department, Frederick Lindemann (Lord Cherwell), whose ideas on building up a permanent staff did not always coincide with Maurice’s. The result was a sad one for Oxford: In 1954, Maurice filled the vacancy left at Bristol University in England, when Nevill Mott moved from there to Cambridge, and theoretical physics at Oxford suffered as a result.At Bristol, Maurice became head of the physics department and continued to publish in a wide range of fields. After 10 years, he was attracted by, and accepted, an offer from the University of Southern California as distinguished professor of physics and chairman of the physics department. At USC, he became disappointed in the progress he could make in expanding the department and was frustrated with the associated politics, so in 1968 he moved to Canada to take the position of senior professor at the University of British Columbia. For the first time in many years, Maurice was totally free of administrative duties.His most important contribution at UBC was as a helpful critic or collaborator on any problem in any branch of physics. His personal research included electromagnetic properties of pulsars, the quantum mechanics of the hydrogen atom in very large magnetic fields, and many problems in general relativity. Although much of his work was completed, virtually none was published. He had a substantial interest in experimental molecular spectroscopy and multiphoton processes. Maurice would always ask, “What is the experiment?” He wanted to know exactly what was being measured and how. But learning of a well-resolved complex UV spectrum of the hydroxyl molecule that had baffled professionals, he asked to see the data, fully expecting to finish his analysis over a weekend. After 25 years, much work, and many interesting collateral results, this spectrum remained for him a puzzle, and is still unsolved.Maurice remained active in research and consultation, which included the problem of the disposal of radioactive waste, until 1999, when he suffered a stroke that left him effectively a quadriplegic at age 86. After a brief period of severe depression, his acceptance of his condition led to an active intellectual life, which continued until his death.Maurice Henry Lecorney PrycePPT|High resolution© 2004 American Institute of Physics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.232

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0690.048

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics TodaySame topicScientific Research and DiscoveriesFrench-language works237,207