MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1984906692 · doi:10.1093/brain/awu341

Parkinsonism in GTP cyclohydrolase 1 mutation carriers

2014· letter· en· W1984906692 sur OpenAlexafffund
Ilaria Guella, Holly E. Sherman, Silke Appel‐Cresswell, Alex Rajput, Ali H. Rajput, Matthew J. Farrer

Notice bibliographique

RevueBrain · 2014
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueMetabolism and Genetic Disorders
Établissements canadiensUniversity of SaskatchewanPacific Centre for Reproductive MedicineUniversity of British ColumbiaSaskatchewan Health AuthorityUniversity of British Columbia Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaGenome British Columbia
Mots-clésParkinsonismDystoniaLevodopaGTP cyclohydrolase IExome sequencingMutationDopamineGeneticsDiseaseInternal medicineMedicineParkinson's diseaseNeurosciencePsychologyBiologyTetrahydrobiopterinGene

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Sir, We read with great interest the article by Mencacci and colleagues (2014) reporting a significantly higher frequency of GTP cyclohydrolase 1 (GCH1) variants in patients with Parkinson’s disease compared to controls. Whole-exome sequencing of a large case-control cohort showed that rare GCH1 coding variants are associated with a 7-fold increased risk of Parkinson’s disease. Heterozygous loss-of-function mutations in GCH1, a crucial enzyme for dopamine production in nigrostriatal neurons (Kaufman, 1959; Nagatsu et al., 1964), are the most common cause of DOPA-responsive dystonia (DRD) (Ichinose et al., 1994). DRD is a rare hereditary disease characterized by childhood-onset, generalized dystonia and a dramatic long-lasting response to levodopa (Segawa et al., 1976). The disease may also manifest in adulthood with parkinsonism as the sole or dominant clinical feature (Hjermind et al., 2006; Momma et al., 2009). GCH1 mutations have been shown to segregate in pedigrees with multiple individuals affected by isolated parkinsonism, a phenotype that is likely due to nigrostriatal degeneration (Kikuchi et al., 2004; Hjermind et al., 2006; Eggers et al., 2012; Mencacci et al., 2014). Herein, we report GCH1 variability in patients with Parkinson’s disease (n = 361, 68.7% male, mean age 69.9 ± 12.8 years; mean age at onset 58.3 ± 12.9 years), atypical parkinsonism (n = 167, male 61.7%, mean age 77.5 ± 12.2 years; mean age at onset 66.3 ± 11.2 years, including diagnostic categories of dementia with Lewy bodies, progressive supranuclear palsy and multiple system atrophy) and control subjects (n = 290, 59% male; mean age 73.3 ± 11.2 years). Sequencing of GCH1 coding regions, performed on the SOLiD 5500xl platform (Life Technologies), identified four rare heterozygous non-synonymous coding substitutions including: (i) a novel missense variation (p.A99D); (ii) the known DRD pathogenic mutation (p.K224R); and (iii) two benign variants (p.P23L and p.P69L) (Jarman et al., 1997; Mencacci et al., 2014). The p.A99D mutation was identified in a male patient with typical late-onset Parkinson’s disease (age at onset 61 years) with an extensive family history of dementia and parkinsonism. This amino acid position is highly conserved, and substitution of a hydrophobic non-polar (alanine) to a negatively charged (glutamic acid) amino acid is likely to perturb the amphipathic alpha-helical structure of this domain. The mutation has not been reported in the publically available Exome Variant Server data set (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/), which suggests it is unlikely to be a benign, albeit rare, variant. The p.K224R mutation, previously described in pedigrees with dominantly inherited DRD (Leuzzi et al., 2002), was detected in two unrelated Canadian patients. One had asymmetrical tremor onset parkinsonism (age at onset 82 years) and good levodopa response. She died at 90 years and brain pathology showed tau-immunoreactive neurofibrillary tangles consistent with a diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy. However, immunohistochemistry for α-synuclein revealed immunopositive staining in the brainstem, suggesting the concomitant presence of Lewy body pathology. The other carrier has typical late-onset Parkinson’s disease (age at onset 76 years). Her affected sister, diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease (age at onset 64 years) also carries the p.K224R mutation and her deceased father had Parkinson’s disease. Overall, the frequency of GCH1 pathogenic mutations in patients is 0.57% (3/528), whereas only two benign variants were identified in one control subject, consistent with the recently published results (frequency in patients with Parkinson’s disease 0.75% versus controls 0.1%) (Mencacci et al., 2014) and may concur with a mega meta-analysis of genome-wide association data which have highlighted GCH1 as a low-risk susceptibility locus for Parkinson’s disease (Nalls et al., 2014). Taken together these data suggest that GCH1 genetic variability should be considered as a risk factor for parkinsonism. Past studies investigating the role of GCH1 variability in early-onset Parkinson’s disease have reported negative results (Hertz et al., 2006; Cobb et al., 2009), although they were performed in relatively small cohorts insufficiently powered to assess the contribution of rare variants. To confirm pathogenicity, segregation analysis of putative GCH1 mutations within extended pedigrees is warranted; whether GCH1 parkinsonism is more penetrant in females, as for DRD (Furukawa et al., 1998) may also be qualified. Moreover the presence of GCH1 copy number variants may be as frequent and should be assessed (Wider et al., 2008). Additional autopsy studies may address whether post-mortem tauopathy is an incidental finding, merely concurrent, or a consequence of GCH1 mutations. Insight into the pathogenic mechanism may help elucidate the role of dopamine metabolism in nigrostriatal degeneration and parkinsonism, and to develop new therapeutic targets. Canada Excellence Research Chairs program (M.J.F.), the Cundill Foundation (M.J.F), Leading Edge Endowment. Funds provided by the Province of British Columbia, LifeLabs, and Genome BC which support the Dr Donald Rix BC Leadership Chair (M.J.F), as well as the Pacific Parkinson’s Research Institute (S.A.C.).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Étude de cas · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,014
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,010

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,008
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0010,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0140,009
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,231
Écart entre enseignants0,225 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeÉtude de cas
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations24
Publié2014
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBrainMême sujetMetabolism and Genetic DisordersTravaux en français237 207