MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984906692 · doi:10.1093/brain/awu341

Parkinsonism in GTP cyclohydrolase 1 mutation carriers

2014· letter· en· W1984906692 on OpenAlexafffund
Ilaria Guella, Holly E. Sherman, Silke Appel‐Cresswell, Alex Rajput, Ali H. Rajput, Matthew J. Farrer

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain · 2014
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolism and Genetic Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanPacific Centre for Reproductive MedicineUniversity of British ColumbiaSaskatchewan Health AuthorityUniversity of British Columbia Hospital
FundersCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaGenome British Columbia
KeywordsParkinsonismDystoniaLevodopaGTP cyclohydrolase IExome sequencingMutationDopamineGeneticsDiseaseInternal medicineMedicineParkinson's diseaseNeurosciencePsychologyBiologyTetrahydrobiopterinGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sir, We read with great interest the article by Mencacci and colleagues (2014) reporting a significantly higher frequency of GTP cyclohydrolase 1 (GCH1) variants in patients with Parkinson’s disease compared to controls. Whole-exome sequencing of a large case-control cohort showed that rare GCH1 coding variants are associated with a 7-fold increased risk of Parkinson’s disease. Heterozygous loss-of-function mutations in GCH1, a crucial enzyme for dopamine production in nigrostriatal neurons (Kaufman, 1959; Nagatsu et al., 1964), are the most common cause of DOPA-responsive dystonia (DRD) (Ichinose et al., 1994). DRD is a rare hereditary disease characterized by childhood-onset, generalized dystonia and a dramatic long-lasting response to levodopa (Segawa et al., 1976). The disease may also manifest in adulthood with parkinsonism as the sole or dominant clinical feature (Hjermind et al., 2006; Momma et al., 2009). GCH1 mutations have been shown to segregate in pedigrees with multiple individuals affected by isolated parkinsonism, a phenotype that is likely due to nigrostriatal degeneration (Kikuchi et al., 2004; Hjermind et al., 2006; Eggers et al., 2012; Mencacci et al., 2014). Herein, we report GCH1 variability in patients with Parkinson’s disease (n = 361, 68.7% male, mean age 69.9 ± 12.8 years; mean age at onset 58.3 ± 12.9 years), atypical parkinsonism (n = 167, male 61.7%, mean age 77.5 ± 12.2 years; mean age at onset 66.3 ± 11.2 years, including diagnostic categories of dementia with Lewy bodies, progressive supranuclear palsy and multiple system atrophy) and control subjects (n = 290, 59% male; mean age 73.3 ± 11.2 years). Sequencing of GCH1 coding regions, performed on the SOLiD 5500xl platform (Life Technologies), identified four rare heterozygous non-synonymous coding substitutions including: (i) a novel missense variation (p.A99D); (ii) the known DRD pathogenic mutation (p.K224R); and (iii) two benign variants (p.P23L and p.P69L) (Jarman et al., 1997; Mencacci et al., 2014). The p.A99D mutation was identified in a male patient with typical late-onset Parkinson’s disease (age at onset 61 years) with an extensive family history of dementia and parkinsonism. This amino acid position is highly conserved, and substitution of a hydrophobic non-polar (alanine) to a negatively charged (glutamic acid) amino acid is likely to perturb the amphipathic alpha-helical structure of this domain. The mutation has not been reported in the publically available Exome Variant Server data set (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/), which suggests it is unlikely to be a benign, albeit rare, variant. The p.K224R mutation, previously described in pedigrees with dominantly inherited DRD (Leuzzi et al., 2002), was detected in two unrelated Canadian patients. One had asymmetrical tremor onset parkinsonism (age at onset 82 years) and good levodopa response. She died at 90 years and brain pathology showed tau-immunoreactive neurofibrillary tangles consistent with a diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy. However, immunohistochemistry for α-synuclein revealed immunopositive staining in the brainstem, suggesting the concomitant presence of Lewy body pathology. The other carrier has typical late-onset Parkinson’s disease (age at onset 76 years). Her affected sister, diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease (age at onset 64 years) also carries the p.K224R mutation and her deceased father had Parkinson’s disease. Overall, the frequency of GCH1 pathogenic mutations in patients is 0.57% (3/528), whereas only two benign variants were identified in one control subject, consistent with the recently published results (frequency in patients with Parkinson’s disease 0.75% versus controls 0.1%) (Mencacci et al., 2014) and may concur with a mega meta-analysis of genome-wide association data which have highlighted GCH1 as a low-risk susceptibility locus for Parkinson’s disease (Nalls et al., 2014). Taken together these data suggest that GCH1 genetic variability should be considered as a risk factor for parkinsonism. Past studies investigating the role of GCH1 variability in early-onset Parkinson’s disease have reported negative results (Hertz et al., 2006; Cobb et al., 2009), although they were performed in relatively small cohorts insufficiently powered to assess the contribution of rare variants. To confirm pathogenicity, segregation analysis of putative GCH1 mutations within extended pedigrees is warranted; whether GCH1 parkinsonism is more penetrant in females, as for DRD (Furukawa et al., 1998) may also be qualified. Moreover the presence of GCH1 copy number variants may be as frequent and should be assessed (Wider et al., 2008). Additional autopsy studies may address whether post-mortem tauopathy is an incidental finding, merely concurrent, or a consequence of GCH1 mutations. Insight into the pathogenic mechanism may help elucidate the role of dopamine metabolism in nigrostriatal degeneration and parkinsonism, and to develop new therapeutic targets. Canada Excellence Research Chairs program (M.J.F.), the Cundill Foundation (M.J.F), Leading Edge Endowment. Funds provided by the Province of British Columbia, LifeLabs, and Genome BC which support the Dr Donald Rix BC Leadership Chair (M.J.F), as well as the Pacific Parkinson’s Research Institute (S.A.C.).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0140.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrainSame topicMetabolism and Genetic DisordersFrench-language works237,207