MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1986829807 · doi:10.4171/owr/2008/05

Automorphic Forms, Geometry and Arithmetic

2008· article· en· W1986829807 sur OpenAlex
Stephen S. Kudla, Joachim Schwermer

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueOberwolfach Reports · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMathematics
ThématiqueMathematics and Applications
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésArithmeticAutomorphic formMathematicsLanglands–Shahidi methodAutomorphic L-functionAlgebra over a fieldGeometryPure mathematics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The theory of automorphic forms has its roots in the early ninteenth century in classical work of Euler, Gauss, Jacobi, Eisenstein, and others. The subject experienced a vast expansion and reformulation following the work of Selberg, Harish-Chandra, and Langlands, in the 1970's, and remains the focus of intense current activity. The goal of this meeting was two-fold, first to provide an overview of the most recent developments in the theory of automorphic forms and automorphic representations, and, second, to provide a glimpse of the many closely related topics involving geometry and arithmetic where automorphic forms play an important role. Thus, one subset of the lectures (Soudry, Waldspurger, Gan, Muic, Moeglin, and Henniart) focused on automorphic forms and automorphic representations, while a second subset ranged quite widely and included geometry (Burger), arithmetic geometry (Pink, Howard, Nekovar, Yang), moduli spaces (Rapoport, van der Geer, Görtz, Ngô), Galois theory (Savin) and L-functions (Harder, Shahidi). Among the many fundamental insights of Langlands are the following: (a) Automorphic representations of a given reductive group G over a number field should occur in packets (L-packets or Arthur packets), parametrized by representations of the Weil–Deligne group into the Langlands dual group {}^LG . A local version of this should describe the (irreducible, admissible) representations of the group G(F) for any local field F . (b) It is necessary to consider the automorphic representations of all reductive groups together and, in particular, their relations, the most important of which are predicted by the principle of functoriality. These insights lie very deep and their complete realization is still a very distant dream. Nonetheless, they have provided a guide for much of the subsequent research in this area and a number of the most important techniques that have been brought to bear were discussed at the meeting. These included the Arthur–Selberg trace formula, fundamental lemma, local and global descent, converse theorems, local theta correspondence, and Eisenstein series. The connections of automorphic forms with geometry and arithmetic are many and important. One such set of connections occurs in the theory of Shimura varieties. Here important topics include interpretation as moduli spaces and period domains, the arithmetic of Heegner points and their higher dimensional generalizations, including their arithmetic intersections and heights, and the structure of Shimura varieties in characteristic p>0 . Automorphic forms have a deep connection with the geometry of locally symmetric spaces, where, for example, the boundary behavior of cohomology classes and Eisenstein series can be applied to the study of special values of L-functions. Again, all of these aspects were discussed during the program. The meeting revealed, once again, that the theory of automorphic forms continues to be a vibrant subject in which many exciting developments can be expected in the future. Special event On Friday afternoon, the Oberwolfach Prize was awarded to Ngô Bao-Chao for his work on the fundamental lemma. The award presentation, by Professor Reinhold Remmert, was followed by a Laudatio given by Michael Rapoport explaining the significance of Ngô's work and describing a basic case of the fundamental lemma. Rapoport's Laudatio is included at the end of this report. Ngô then gave a lecture in which he explained some of the fundamental ideas of his proof, for example, the use of the Hitchin fibration. In the evening, there was a festive dinner.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,315
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,513

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,060
Tête enseignante GPT0,294
Écart entre enseignants0,234 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle