MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1987255417 · doi:10.1097/01.acm.0000360330.75949.a0

A Lifetime Investment

2009· article· en· W1987255417 sur OpenAlexfundno aff
Kimberly D. Manning

Notice bibliographique

RevueAcademic Medicine · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueInnovations in Medical Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesDivision of Undergraduate EducationPublic Health Agency of CanadaMcMaster University
Mots-clésRecallPsychologyMedical educationMedicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A mass e-mail flashed across my inbox one day in early 2007 that read, “Sixteen faculty will be selected to participate in a four-year longitudinal teaching experience beginning in the summer of 2007. We are seeking committed clinician educators who are able to dedicate a significant amount of time to this important teaching endeavor.” I decided to give it a try and was delighted to be among those selected. A rigorous faculty development course ensued, and before I knew it, I had received a slip of paper with a list of names that I would come to know quite well—my “small group.” From their very first day of medical school, I have taught, mentored, laughed, cried, and learned with these seven remarkable individuals. I always thought work was fulfilling, but now it has taken on a whole new definition. These seven wonders are pushing me to a completely different level, making me yearn to be a better doctor, a better person, and the best role model. I still recall when my group agreed to raise money for and participate in our local AIDS walk. As we prepared to file out of the room after one of our weekly meetings leading up to the event, one student asked, “So, tell us, Dr. Manning, what do you think students really need to know about caring for HIV-positive patients?” I paused for a second, and then answered carefully, “You know what? No matter what the diagnosis, I think I just try to always remember that every patient was once somebody’s baby.” Before I could say anything more, they had all left the room and disappeared into the stairwell. A few weeks, two bake sales, and several donations later, we proudly convened on an early Sunday morning for the AIDS walk. This particular year, pieces of the AIDS Memorial Quilt were on display for walk participants. As we took in the magnitude of the quilt with awe, one student said solemnly, “You were right. Every patient was once somebody’s baby.” In that instant, it dawned on me that they were really listening to me and internalizing my words and actions, underscoring the paramount importance of professionalism and responsible role modeling. Time has flown by, and now my seven students are wrapping up their preclinical experience. The naïveté has begun to wane, and knowledge is increasing. And with this growing medical maturity, I must loosen the reins a bit—and that’s not always easy. The mother in me wants them to remain babies forever, clapping hysterically with every little milestone reached. That’s what’s unique about this teaching experience. We have built relationships that have deepened week after week. And while, yes, I have formed lasting bonds with other learners, never has an assignment left me so invested. I intensely want them to be the doctors who listen, who stand up for the little guy, and who think about their patients before closing their eyes at night. I want them to hold a scared patient’s trembling hand, even if it is a little clammy, and I want them to say please and thank you to everyone from the head nurse to the cafeteria lady. I hope they will always regard every patient, whatever their circumstances, as somebody’s beloved baby. For the first time, I feel personally responsible for leading them to that place. In two years, my students will march into commencement, all clad in medical school regalia. And on that day, the pinnacle of medical school milestones, I will leap to my feet and clap hysterically one last time as my seven babies all take their first steps toward becoming role models for the next generation of learners. Kimberly D. Manning, MD Dr. Manning is assistant professor of medicine, Division of General Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; ([email protected]).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,485
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,734

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,020
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,002
Communication savante0,0140,010
Science ouverte0,0020,007
Intégrité de la recherche0,0060,007
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,4850,324

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,371
Écart entre enseignants0,344 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAcademic Medicine→Même sujetInnovations in Medical Education→Travaux en français237 207→