MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A Lifetime Investment

2009· article· en· W1987255417 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Kimberly D. Manning

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademic Medicine · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInnovations in Medical Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Undergraduate EducationPublic Health Agency of CanadaMcMaster University
KeywordsRecallPsychologyMedical educationMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A mass e-mail flashed across my inbox one day in early 2007 that read, “Sixteen faculty will be selected to participate in a four-year longitudinal teaching experience beginning in the summer of 2007. We are seeking committed clinician educators who are able to dedicate a significant amount of time to this important teaching endeavor.” I decided to give it a try and was delighted to be among those selected. A rigorous faculty development course ensued, and before I knew it, I had received a slip of paper with a list of names that I would come to know quite well—my “small group.” From their very first day of medical school, I have taught, mentored, laughed, cried, and learned with these seven remarkable individuals. I always thought work was fulfilling, but now it has taken on a whole new definition. These seven wonders are pushing me to a completely different level, making me yearn to be a better doctor, a better person, and the best role model. I still recall when my group agreed to raise money for and participate in our local AIDS walk. As we prepared to file out of the room after one of our weekly meetings leading up to the event, one student asked, “So, tell us, Dr. Manning, what do you think students really need to know about caring for HIV-positive patients?” I paused for a second, and then answered carefully, “You know what? No matter what the diagnosis, I think I just try to always remember that every patient was once somebody’s baby.” Before I could say anything more, they had all left the room and disappeared into the stairwell. A few weeks, two bake sales, and several donations later, we proudly convened on an early Sunday morning for the AIDS walk. This particular year, pieces of the AIDS Memorial Quilt were on display for walk participants. As we took in the magnitude of the quilt with awe, one student said solemnly, “You were right. Every patient was once somebody’s baby.” In that instant, it dawned on me that they were really listening to me and internalizing my words and actions, underscoring the paramount importance of professionalism and responsible role modeling. Time has flown by, and now my seven students are wrapping up their preclinical experience. The naïveté has begun to wane, and knowledge is increasing. And with this growing medical maturity, I must loosen the reins a bit—and that’s not always easy. The mother in me wants them to remain babies forever, clapping hysterically with every little milestone reached. That’s what’s unique about this teaching experience. We have built relationships that have deepened week after week. And while, yes, I have formed lasting bonds with other learners, never has an assignment left me so invested. I intensely want them to be the doctors who listen, who stand up for the little guy, and who think about their patients before closing their eyes at night. I want them to hold a scared patient’s trembling hand, even if it is a little clammy, and I want them to say please and thank you to everyone from the head nurse to the cafeteria lady. I hope they will always regard every patient, whatever their circumstances, as somebody’s beloved baby. For the first time, I feel personally responsible for leading them to that place. In two years, my students will march into commencement, all clad in medical school regalia. And on that day, the pinnacle of medical school milestones, I will leap to my feet and clap hysterically one last time as my seven babies all take their first steps toward becoming role models for the next generation of learners. Kimberly D. Manning, MD Dr. Manning is assistant professor of medicine, Division of General Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; ([email protected]).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.485
Threshold uncertainty score0.734

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0140.010
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0060.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4850.324

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcademic Medicine→Same topicInnovations in Medical Education→French-language works237,207→