Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In 1985, Dr Eric Milne successfully launched the first issue of the Journal of Thoracic Imaging. This inaugural issue was a visionary symposium devoted to state-of-the-art reviews of what were then considered “new” techniques for imaging the thorax, including digital radiography, high-resolution computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography. Twenty-five years later, these same previously “new” techniques now comprise the mainstay of thoracic imaging. It is interesting to reflect on the many technological advances and new applications that have been developed for these techniques during the past quarter of a century. With this in mind, I would like to bring to your attention a series of special commentaries in which leading experts in these areas consider the articles from the inaugural issue and comment upon advances that have occurred during the past 25 years. As we celebrate the 25th anniversary of the Journal this year, we will also be reporting the perspectives of cardiopulmonary radiologists from across the globe regarding their reflections on the past 25 years of our specialty and their predictions for the next 25 years. The first of this 4-part series entitled “25 on 25” is introduced in this issue, with 25 luminaries responding to the question: “What is the most influential article or advance in our specialty in the past 25 years?” I invite you, our readers, to share your views in our new “quick poll” feature at www.thoracicimaging.com. The history of the Journal is closely tied to the major thoracic imaging societies, whose members have contributed to the Journal as editors, editorial board members, reviewers, contributing authors, and readers. It is thus appropriate that the Society of Thoracic Imaging, the Japanese Society of Thoracic Radiology, the Korean Society of Thoracic Radiology, the European Society of Thoracic Imaging, and the Fleischner Society have all contributed historical articles to this issue. These articles document the rich histories of these organizations and their invaluable contributions to the field. An anniversary issue would not be complete without a consideration of the history of the Journal itself, including the many people who have contributed to its development and operations throughout the years. Toward this end, this issue includes an article devoted to the history of the Journal of Thoracic Imaging that was contributed by Otha Linton, a highly regarded journalist with expertise in writing histories of radiologic organizations. This issue marks not only the end of the Journal's first 25 years but also the beginning of its next quarter century. It is thus fitting that this issue not only looks back, but also moves forward by debuting an expanded format with 20 pages of web-exclusive content. Beginning with this issue, case reports will now be exclusively published electronically, thereby providing additional pages in the printed version of the Journal for more symposia articles, original scientific articles, and other content. The past 25 years have been an exciting time for our specialty and for the Journal. It is my hope that this issue appropriately honors this important milestone, acknowledges the past, and affirms the Journal's strong future. Now, and throughout the coming year, I invite you to join me in looking back at the remarkable advances of the past 25 years and in looking forward to exciting new ones!
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».