Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Katherine Isbester received her PhD from the University of Toronto in 1996. Her book, Still Fighting: The Nicaraguan Women's Movement 1977-2000, was recently published by the University of Pittsburgh Press.NICARAGUAN POLITICS, which received so much coverage during the 1980s, has received precious little since. Recently, however, the media silence has been broken. Nicaragua began to receive international attention once again when Daniel Ortega announced his intention to run for the presidency in the election of 4 November 2001. The possibility of the return of a man with historic links to Middle Eastern terrorist nations, as the American government reminded Nicaraguans, prompted a high level of diplomatic intervention.Perhaps the flurry of diplomatic activity was unnecessary. The Ortega of today and his party, the Sandinista Front for National Liberation (FSLN), have changed in their decade out of power. To have a chance at re-election, Ortega and the FSLN altered their fundamental orientation from supporting the poor to co-operating with the Nicaraguan elite at the same time as they capitalized on its divisions. This article analyzes how the outgoing government, the American-backed right-wing Liberal Alliance, divided the elite in Nicaragua and alienated the populace during the 1990s, thus paving the way for the re-emergence of Ortega and the FSLN. As a result of the FSLN remodelling itself and the Liberals underperforming, the election was too close to call.When the FSLN came to power through a popular revolution in 1979, it initiated a number of social justice programmes to help the disenfranchised and the poor, fought an American-backed counter-revolutionary civil war, and nationalized parts of the economy. It also implemented an agrarian reform programme. Despite these muchlauded policies, it was democratically voted out of power in 1990.The Nicaraguan populace opted for right-wing American-approved governments that promised peace with the United States and economic prosperity. Since the FSLN were voted out of office, there have been two such governments. The National United Opposition (UNO), led by Violeta Chamorro, lasted from 1990 to 1996. It oversaw Nicaragua's transition to a capitalist economy integrated into the global market through structural adjustment programmes, the professionalization of the army, the finalization of peace with the counter-revolutionary forces, and an inter-party agreement over property ownership. Nonetheless, the standard of living for the vast majority of the populace fell, violence in the form of re-armed militias increased, and governance ground to a halt in 1994. As a result, Nicaraguans doubted the ability of democratic institutions to improve their lives. On the brink of social, political, and economic chaos, in the 1996 presidential elections they chose a neo-populist(1) strongman, Arnoldo Aleman of the Liberal Alliance.Aleman, a lawyer who represented banks and other commercial enterprises before the 1979 revolution, came from a family of staunch supporters of the dictatorship. His property, like that of all those who had been closely affiliated with the dictator, Somoza, was seized by the FSLN, and Aleman was jailed and released. Nonetheless, he remained in Nicaragua through the 1980s increasing his land holdings. In 1990, he was elected to Managua's city council and manoeuvred to become mayor, a position he held until he became president in 1996. While in office, he beautified the city by installing fountains and traffic round-abouts, planting trees, and knocking down crumbling buildings. These programmes were remarkably popular even among the poor and made a visible - if superficial - difference to the city. Throughout his tenure, Aleman publicized how much he was able to accomplish compared to the stalemated National Assembly. During his election campaign, he promised the same modernization treatment for the country. Funded by the Nicaraguan elite and American expatriates, including the rich expatriate Cuban-American community, Aleman won the election. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».